You are viewing [info]defensebriefs's journal

defensebriefs

Indologists and those interested to learn about India must read the prodigiously written book by Aravind Adiga, and prolifically penned writings of Satis Shroff.  Not gauging the reality may create inherent risks, not only for businessmen but also for analysts and strategic thinkers. Euphoria or melancholia cannot be sustained through media hype.  An ephemeral image based upon false premises cannot be stand the scrutiny of reality. The real news about Bharat (aka India) either escapes the editors of the Rupert Murdock news media which fuels the rumors that there is some sort of a mechanism that surfaces only a certain types of  news emanating from Delhi. Aravind Adigahas brilliantly described the truth about the cities of Bharat and how they function.

White Tiger by Aravind Adiga: In this darkly comic début novel set in India, Balram, a chauffeur, murders his employer, justifying his crime as the act of a "social entrepreneur." In a series of letters to the Premier of China, in anticipation of the leader’s upcoming visit to Balram’s homeland, the chauffeur recounts his transformation from an honest, hardworking boy growing up in "the Darkness"—those areas of rural India where education and electricity are equally scarce, and where villagers banter about local elections "like eunuchs discussing the Kama Sutra"—to a determined killer. He places the blame for his rage squarely on the avarice of the Indian élite, among whom bribes are commonplace, and who perpetuate a system in which many are sacrificed to the whims of a few. Adiga’s message isn’t subtle or novel, but Balram’s appealingly sardonic voice and acute observations of the social order are both winning and unsettling. The New Yorker.

Secular India =Dalits under Hindu Rashtra & Muslims under Ram Raj

India: Unable to bear the Brutal Brahamanic persecution-- Buddhism survives in South East Asia Why did Buddhism disappear from South Asia? Brahminatrocities conducted mass genocide Persecution of Buddhists in India The ManuwadiHindus destroyed Buddhism in its own land of birth

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape 

The vision of shining India is propagated every week by Fareed Zakaria. He of course deprecates Pakistan as his second nature.  His mission is to hidethe truth and spread malicious propaganda. Fareed Zakaria will never bring out the Adiga perspective.  

The author writes about poverty, corruption, aggression and the brutal struggle for power in the Indian society. A society in which the middle class is reaching economically for the sky, in which Adiga’s biting and scathing criticism sounds out of place, when deshi Indians are dreaming of manned flights to the moon, outer space and mountains of nuclear arsenal against China or any other neighbouring states that might try to flex muscles against Hindustan.

Delhi: 3500-yrs of massacres of Dalit-Sudra Blacks by Arya-Brahmins Who are the Untouchables? by Dr. Ambedkar Sudra Holocaust:Ongoing Genocide of millions of Dalits in India

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Thousands of Bollywood movies are made every year. Very few are filmed in Bharat, and most do not ever show Bharati towns and cities. Skyscrapers in Dubai, and Kuala Lumpur as passed off as office buildings of Bharati two bit actors. Like the wise men of Gotham, some Bharati's begin believing their own propaganda

India is sometimes like a Bollywood film, which the poverty-stricken masses enjoy watching, to forget their daily problems for two hours. The rich Indians want to give their gastrointestinal tract a rest and so they go to the cinema between bouts of paan-spitting and farting due to lack of exercise and oily food. They all identify themselves withthe protagonists for these hundred and twenty minutes and are transported into another world with location shooting in Switzerland, Schwarzwald, Grand Canyon, the Egyptian Pyramids, sizzling London, fashionable New York and romantic Paris. After twelve songs, emotions taking a roller-coaster ride, the Indians stagger out of the stuffy, sweaty cinemas and are greeted by the blazing and scorching Indian sun, slums, streets spilling with haggard, emaciated humanity, pocket-thieves, real-life goondas, cheating businessmen, money-lenders, snake-girl-destitute-charmers, thugs in white collars and the big question: what shall I and my family eat tonight? Roti, kapada, makan, that is, bread, clothes and a posh house are like a dream to most Indians dwelling in the pavements of Mumbai, or for that matter in Delhi, Bangalore, Mangalore, Mysore, Calcutta (Read Günter Grass’s Zunge Zeigen) and other Indian cities, where they burn rubbish for warmth.

The stomach groans with a sad melody in the loneliness and darkness of a metropolis like Mumbai, a city that never sleeps. As Adiga says, ‘an India of Light, and an India of Darkness in which the black, polluted river Mother Ganga flows.’

Ach, munjo Mumbai! The terrible monsoon, the jam-packed city, Koliwada, Sion, Bandra, Marine Drive, Juhu Beach. I can visualise them all, like I was there. I spent almost every winter during the holidays visiting my uncles, aunts and cousins, the jet-set Shroffs of Bombay. I’m glad that there are people like Aravind Adiga, Salman Rushdie, Arundhati Roy and Kiran Desai who speak for the millions of under-privileged, downtrodden people and give them a voice through literature. Aravind deserves the Man Booker Prize like no other, because the novel is extraordinary. It doesn’t have the intellectual poise of VS Naipaul or Rushdie’s masala language. It has it’s own Mumbaimatter-of-fact speech, a melange of Oxford and NY. And what we get to hear when we take the crowded trains from the suburbs of this vast metropolis, with its mixture of Marathi, Gujerati, Sindhi and scores of other Indian languages is also what Balram is talking about. Adiga was bold enough to present the Other India than what film moghuls and other so-called intellectuals would have us believe.

Dalit leader Dr. Ambedkar struggled to emancipate the “untouchables” from the shackles of Hindu prescribed slavery-- the caste system.
 
Ambeekar wanted to free the Dalits& to allow them to regain their inalienable rights as human beings--highlighting the servitude, humiliation, trials & tribulations of being born in a low caste family and struggled to uplift the “untouchables”, the indigenous people, women & other disadvantaged sections of society.

Balram’s is a strong political voice and mirrors the Indian society which wants to present Bharat in superlatives: superpower, affluent society and mainstream culture, whereas in reality there’s tremendous darkness in the society of the subcontinent. Even though Adiga has lived a life of affluence, studied at Columbia and Oxford universities, he has raised his voice in his book against the nepotism, corruption, in-fighting between communal groups, between the rich and the super-rich, a dynamic process in which the poor, dalits, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s Children of God (untouchables), ‘scheduled’ castes and tribes have no outlet, and are to this day mere pawns at the hands of the rich in Hindustan, as India was called before the Brits came to colonise the sub-continent. Balram, Adiga’s protagonist, shows how to assert oneself in the Indian society, come what may. I hope this book won’t create monsters without character, integrity, ethos, and soulless humans, devoid of values and norms. From what sources are the characters drawn? The story is in the form of a letter written by the protagonist to the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao and is drawn from India’s history as told by a school drop-out, chauffeur, entrepreneur, a self-mademan with all his charms and flaws, a man who knows his own India, and who presents his views frankly and candidly, sometimes much like P.G. Wodehouse’s Bertie Wooster.

The author's attitudetoward his characters is comical and satirical when it comes to realities of life for India’s poverty stricken underdogs, whether in the form of a rickshaw puller, tea-shop boy or the driver of a rich Indian businessman. His characters are alive and kicking, and it is a delight to go with Balramin this thrilling ride through India’s history, Bangalore, Old and New Delhi, Mumbai and its denizens. The major theme is how to get along in a sprawling country like India, and the author reveals his murderous plan brilliantly through a series of police descriptions of a man named Balram Halwai. The theme is a beaten path, traditional and familiar, for this is not the first book on Mumbai and Indian society. Other stalwarts like Kuldip Singh, Salman Rushdie, Amitabh Ghosh, VS Naipaul, Anita and Kiran Desai and a host of writers from the Raj have walked along this path, each penning their respective Zeitgeist. In this case, the theme is social, entertaining, escapist in nature, and the reader is like a voyeur in the scenarios created by Balaram.

The climax is when the Chinese leader actually comes to Bangalore. So much for Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai. Unlike Kiran Desai (The Inheritance of Loss) Adiga says, “Based on my experience, Indian girls are the best. (Well second best. I tell you, Mr Jiaobao, it’s one of the most thrilling sights you can have as a man in Bangalore, to see the eyes of a pair of Nepali girls flashing out at you from the dark hood of an autorickshaw (sic). As to the intellectual qualities of the writing, I loved the simplicity and clarity that Adigahas chosen for his novel. He intersperses his text witha lot of dialogue withhis characters and increases the readability score, and is dripping withsatire and humour, even while describing an earnest emotional matter like the cremation of Balram’s mother, whereby the humour is entirely British---with Indian undertones. The setting is cleverly constructed. In order to have pace and action in the story Adiga sends Balram to the streets of Bangalore as a chauffeur, and suddenly you’re in the middle of a conversation and narration where a wily driver Balram tunes in. He’s learning, ever learning from the smart guys in the back seat, and in the end he’s the smartest guy in Bangalore, evoking an atmosphere of struggle for survival in the jungles of concrete in India. Indeed, blazingly savage, this book. A good buy this autumn.

About the Author: Satis Shroff is the published author of three books on www.Lulu.com: Im Schatten des Himalaya (book of poems in German), Through Nepalese Eyes (travelgue), Katmandu, Katmandu (poetry and prose anthology by Nepalese authors, edited by Satis Shroff). His lyrical works have been published in literary poetry sites: Slow Trains, International Zeitschrift, World Poetry Society (WPS), New Writing North, Muses Review, The Megaphone, The Megaphone, Pen Himalaya, Interpoetry. Satis Shroff is a member of “Writers of Peace”, poets, essayists, novelists (PEN), World Poetry Society (WPS) and The Asian Writer.

Satis Shroff is a poet and writer based in Freiburg (poems, fiction, non-fiction) who also writes on ecological, ethno-medical, culture-ethnological themes. He has studied Zoology and Botany in Nepal, Medicine and Social Sciences in Germany and Creative Writing in Freiburg and the United Kingdom. He describes himself as a mediator between western and eastern cultures and sees his future as a writer and poet. Since literature is one of the most important means of cross-cultural learning, he is dedicated to promoting and creating awareness for Creative Writing and transculturaltogetherness in his writings, and in preserving an attitude of Miteinander in this world. He lectures in Basle (Switzerland) and in Germany at the Akademie für medizinische Berufe (University Klinikum Freiburg) and the Zentrum für Schlüsselqualifikationen (University of Freiburg). Satis Shroff was awarded the German Academic Exchange Prize.

 

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Arvind Adiga, a Brahmin from coastal Karnataka recently got the Booker Prize for his novel ‘White Tiger’. The novel describes the travails of a Dalit man from north India and how he finally triumphs over his slavery to the feudal upper caste and becomes an entrepreneur in the IT city of Bangalore.

Many reviewers have mentioned that the novel represents the struggle of a Dalit Man and his attainment of the ‘Indian Dream’. Several so called Dalit intellectuals got this book to the notice of the editor of Dalit Nation. We finally read the book and tried to put it in perspective within the overall Dalit literature and body of knowledge. What we found in this process was not in consonance with the rest of the reviewers.

The author of ‘White Tiger’ divides India into two - the Light part and the Dark part. The land of darkness is the cow belt states of North India – UP, Bihar, MP. The land of light are the states of the south especially cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad. This is the basic flaw of the novel. The author has assumed that caste equations are predominant in the northern Indian villages and the southern cities are lands of milk and honey where free will and thereby entrepreneurs can thrive. In the northern villages the destiny of Dalit men are fixed and irrevocable. The Dalits are born in such squalor where the parents forget to name their children. They finally end up as the servant, cleaners and car drivers of the upper feudal caste.

The basic problem with this premise is that it gives a clean chit to the southern cities. The editor of Dalit Nation has lived in Indian metropolitan cities and is well aware of the deeply entrenched casteism in these cities. The IT industry in Bangalore is no haven of equality (Read our article – Dalits must agitate for reservation in private sector). We have proved this time and again that the majority of the resources in the cities are appropriated by the upper caste and they control all major business and administration. But Arvind Adiga finds it the right place for the Dalit hero of the novel to escape and find emancipation.

In the whole book there is no mention of our great leader Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar. There is mention of Gandhi in a disparaging way but nowhere the messiah of Dalits is mentioned. The Brahmin author of this novel has no clue about Dalits and northern India and how much the Dalits venerate Babasaheb. The Brahmin Adiga even fails to mention the term Dalit in the whole of the novel. Dalit is a powerful term and it is through this identity all our oppressed brethren relate to each other. It is a clever ploy of the upper caste writers to avoid such words as Dalit and thereby strip them of our identity.

Babasaheb taught the mantra – ‘educate, organize and agitate’. But this novel does not contain any elements of the Dalit mantra. The Dalit hero, Balaram Halwai is uneducated and there is no effort or striving among his community towards education. They seem to be happy in their illiteracy and their impending destiny of life long slavery. And how does the dalit hero escape from the slavery of the upper castes. He works as a car driver to his American educated feudal lord and finally murders him, steals his money and escapes to Bangalore. What is the message the Dalits should take from this stupid book. That they should murder and steal and that is the only way our for them. What nonsense. Is this what Babasaheb taught them.

Why did not the hero of the novel and his community get educated , organized themselves and agitate against the upper caste people. This is what Babasaheb would have done and this is what he exhorted the Dalits to do all his life. But for the Brahmin Adiga the only way out for a Dalit is to murder, steal and live like a fugitive.

And how does our Balram Halwai gets deliverance in Bangalore. He opens a transportation company for call centres by renting out a few vehicles. Is this the success story of a Dalit. I was anticipating the Dalit hero to become a CEO of a software company. But he again ends up as driver or rather a person who hires many drivers.

Does not Arvind Adiga know that we have a Dalit Chief Minister Mayavathi, does he even know who people like Jagajivan Ram and K.R.Narayanan were. Does he know that Babasaheb had a Phd from Columbia University. He finally made the Dalit hero to become the the scum of the IT industry in Bangalore and he wants us to believe that he has found his salvation there. Babasaheb was a lawyer himself and he did not believe in murder or stealing. He believed in the law and was the first law minister of Independent India. Babasaheb was a socialist and believed that state reform is needed for the emancipation of Dalits. But here the Brahmin Adiga gives us a false hope in free market capitalism. The very same capitalism which fuels feudalism and exploitation is praised by the author. What a shame.

Novels like these should be shunned by Dalits as they deny our heritage and demonize our people. The ‘White Tiger’ is neither empowering nor can it emancipate Dalits. In short it is just a piece of junk written by an upper caste Brahmin. This piece of junk is given some Booker or Hooker prize and the upper caste readers read these kinds of novels thinking that this is the Dalit condition and they can rest in peace. The aim of Dalits is social reform through state legislation and cultural revolution. But how can a shameless pseudo intellectual scumbag Arvind Adiga understand this. All they are interested in is the Hooker prize and international readership. We dalits do not need India to be the ‘White Tiger’ we will convert it into the ‘Black Panther’. Arvind Adiga - Not White Tiger but the Black Panther

Dalitsare not the only one facing genocide and enslavement. Muslims face this all the time.

While many people remember the carnage during the last century, the international media is quiet about the victims of Gujarat--both the dead ones and those who survive the nightmare and now live on hell on earth. Some watch Bollywood movies with the gyrating pelvises, but ignore one of the best movies on the subject PARZANIA. Parzania is the true story of a Parsi family that lost its son in the Hindu carnage on Muslims. Parzaniacannot show the rape, pillage, arson, cannibalism, and live burning of human beings, at least it reminds the world of man's humanity on man. The victims of the Gujarat genocide have not gotten justice in Bharat(aka India). The Chief Minister of the state is hoping to become the next prime minister of the country. He roams free and boasts about the genocide on his watch.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by CopyscapeNoticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Tags:
 
 
defensebriefs
25 May 2009 @ 07:03 pm

While many people remember the carnage during the last century, the international media is quiet about the victims of Gujarat--both the dead ones and those who survive the nightmare and now live on hell on earth. Some watch Bollywood movies with the gyrating pelvises, but ignore one of the best movies on the subject PARZANIA. Parzania is the true story of a Parsi family that lost its son in the Hindu carnage on Muslims. Parzania cannot show the rape, pillage, arson, cannibalism, and live burning of human beings, at least it reminds the world of man's humanity on man. The victims of the Gujarat genocide have not gotten justice in Bharat (aka India). The Chief Minister of the state is hoping to become the next prime minister of the country. He roams free and boasts about the genocide on his watch.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

gujarat-riots-agains-muslim

Silence is complicity.

The land of the Indus is incensed about a woman being spanked, and ignores the rape and burring of thousands of Muslim women in Bharat. The Pakistani establishment is impotent to bring the story of Gujarat to the United Nations and the Pakistani media is silent about the butchery. Asma Gilani has written reams about incidents in Pakistan, not a word about the Gujarat slaughter. Ikram Sehgal visits Delhi often, but has never uttered a word Modi's depredation.  Pervez Hoohbhoy, Ayaz Amir and Imtiaz Alam say a lot about the Pakistani military. Mums the word about the Gujarat hecatomb where Muslims were sacrficed to Kali Devi.

  • The worst ever communal carnage of this century in which over 2000 innocents lost their lives
  • Survivors not only lost their livelihood and shelter but also have been degraded to the status of second class citizens
  • Most of the citizen?s inquiry committees by human rights activists have pointed out about the role of state administration and Modi in particular in the violence
  • Hundreds of thousands cannot return home
  • Maya Kodnani, Narendra Modi?s cabinet colleague who instigated and led the carnage in Naroda Patia
  • Modi is being projected as the future Prime minister of India 

India as World Power 1 Superpower India Pt 2

The international press is also silent. Fareed Zarkaria mentions shining India, but forgets to tell the world about the despoliation of Muslims. Joe Klein of Time Magazine discusses the Superpower, but ignores the slums and hides the truth about the Chief Minister of Gujarat--Narendar Modi

 

GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: The charred bodies of Muslim after the Hindus attacked, murdered and burned them in Gujarat in 2002. The fate of Mulsims in India
GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: The charred bodies of Muslim after the Hindus attacked, murdered and burned them in Gujarat in 2002. The fate of Mulsims in India

In the worst ever communal carnage of this century, the post Godhra Gujarat violence, over 2000 innocents lost their lives. Most of the survivors not only lost their livelihood and shelter but also have been degraded to the status of second class citizens. Most of the perpetrators of violence, have not only gone scot-free; many of them had an upward political mobility. The efforts of the victims and human rights activists had yielded very few results and majority of the victims are grieving and living with the scars of their losses. In the whole process, the direction of Apex court to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the role of Modi, his cabinet colleagues and other top functionaries of state and those involved in violence, has come as a sigh of hope. The court gave the direction (April 27, 2002) in response to appeal by Jakia Ahsan Jafri, the widow of slain Congress MP, Ahsan Jafri. One complements the courage and doggedness of Jakia Jafri for all her efforts. 

This comes in the backdrop of the arrest of Maya Kodnani, Modi?s cabinet colleague who instigated and led the Role of Narendra Modi By Ram Puniyani, 02 May, 2009, Countercurrents.org

Indian police inspect the charred remains of a Muslim in Ambasa
Indian police inspect the charred remains of a Muslim in Ambasa

carnage in Naroda Patia. Just to recall, Ahsan Jafri ex Congress MP had made frantic calls to all those concerned but the police help was not forthcoming to save him from the mob assembled by the VHP-Bajrang Dal and others, the lead players in Gujarat carnage. So far the official inquiry committees have not pointed its finger on the role of Modi, while the Human Rights Commission report (2002) pointed out that state machinery failed to protect the innocent people. Most of the citizen?s inquiry committees by human rights activists have pointed out about the role of state administration and Modi in particular in the violence. In the major such report of ?Citizens tribunal? headed by retired Justice Krishna Ayer and Justice P.B.Sawant, (Crime against Humanity), a Minister in Modi?s Government Haren Pandya gave description of the meeting which Modi had called on the evening of Godhra train accident. As per Pandya Modi instructed all the top state officials to let the Hindu anger not be curtailed in the aftermath of Godhra. Modi popularized the thesis that Godhra train was burnt in a pre planned manner by the international terrorism, in collusion with the ISI and local Muslims. Infamously, he announced that every action has an opposite reaction, meaning that now Hindus will take revenge and state should sit back and let the opposite reaction take its course. Gujarat Carnage.

The author of ‘White Tiger’ divides India into two - the Light part and the Dark part. The land of darkness is the cow belt states of North India – UP, Bihar, MP. The land of light are the states of the south especially cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad. This is the basic flaw of the novel. The author has assumed that caste equations are predominant in the northern Indian villages and the southern cities are lands of milk and honey where free will and thereby entrepreneurs can thrive. In the northern villages the destiny of Dalit men are fixed and irrevocable. The Dalits are born in such squalor where the parents forget to name their children. They finally end up as the servant, cleaners and car drivers of the upper feudal caste.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Indian Terrorists: Wanted Dead or Alive

When will Delhi hand over these terrorists?

GUJERAT GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: Indian Muslims digging graves for loved ones who fell victim to bloodthirsty Modi mobs in Gujarat
GUJERAT GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: Indian Muslims digging graves for loved ones who fell victim to bloodthirsty Modi mobs in Gujarat

It is a mad hatter's world. Those who massacred 15 million during world war one,  50 million in word war two and used atomic bombs to decimate entire cities today give the world lectures on nuclear proliferation, violence and peace. It is strange world when charitable societies in the Muslim world are shut down, ostensibly because they support the ex-CIA-agent-turned terrorists while the (Gujarati) Indian American Hotel Association in the United States is free to send millions of Dollars into the coffers of the butcher of Gujarat--Narendar Modi. It is a very strange world when Bobby Jindal, a supporter of Narendar Modi and one who has appeared in fund raising for Modi and (Gujarati) Indian American Hotel Association can hope to become the leader of the Republican party, while orphanages in Pakistan are shut down because they may help some unknown terrorist.

Silence is Complicity!

The IT industry in Bangalore is no haven of equality (Read our article – Dalits must agitate for reservation in private sector). We have proved this time and again that the majority of the resources in the cities are appropriated by the upper caste and they control all major business and administration. But Arvind Adiga finds it the right place for the Dalit hero of the novel to escape and find emancipation.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

GUJARAT GENOCIDE AGAINST CHRISTIANS, DALITS & MUSLIMS Governor Bobby Jindal funded by Anti-Semitic Terrorists Modi & Hindu fundamentalist Modi in “India” funded by US Gujaratis Governor Bobby Jindal is financed by Indian American Hotel Association and he supports the IAHA which funds Modi Christians in India raped & murdered by Hinduists supported by network in the US Indian Hotel Association hosts Modi after US denied him a visa

 Same Harem Pandya was murdered later and his father stated that his murder had taken place on the instance of Modi. While the carnage was on, the Central government, NDA led by BJP, kept watching and barring some stray noises by PM Vajpayee and Home Minister Advani, the carnage went on spilling the rivers of blood. Despite Modi?s claim that he controlled the violence in 72 hours, it took months for the din to settle. Modi's acts of omission were more than obvious. His permitting the procession of dead of Godhra tragedy in the lanes of Ahamadabad, violating all the norms of prevention and control of riot situation are too well documented by now. Now as matters stand our legal system has lots of loopholes and most of the guilty are not punished. On the contrary, in the case of Gujarat, Modi ?succeeded? in splitting the Gujarat society along religious lines, and he took advantage of the communal divide by riding back to power and strengthened his vice like grip on the administration and state as a whole. And now, In Gujarat the matters are not seen as guilty versus innocents, they are seen as Hindu versus Muslim.

 

GUJERAT GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: Modi's Gujarat anti-Muslim Pogram: Indian policemen walking past the charred body of a Muslim
GUJERAT GENOCIDE AGAINST MUSLIMS: Modi's Gujarat anti-Muslim Pogram: Indian policemen walking past the charred body of a Muslim

While on one hand Modi is being projected as the future Prime minister of India, not only by many captains of industry but also by the party sustaining on the fodder of communal divide, the BJP. While most of the people with plural values and concern for national integration are welcoming the direction of Apex court, the others doing electoral calculations point out that this investigation will enhance the standing of Modi. BJP spokesman also pointed out that this direction of Apex court will be helpful to the BJP in electoral arena. The nation is standing on a tragic point where the communal polarization brought in by communal violence and anti-minority propaganda has resulted in the loss of sensitivity of a section of society towards the miseries and travails of large part of our own country, our own nation.

Gujarat Carnage: Role of Narendra Modi By Ram Puniyani, 02 May, 2009, Countercurrents.org

The Gujarat victims are not the only ones who suffer on a daily basis. The plight of 450 million Indian enslaved Untouchables is a story that does not see the light of day. More than 60 per cent of Dalits are landless. Over 40 million of them are bonded labourers. Dalits are the worst victims of labour coercion “The 1991 Government survey of India states that on an average day, two Dalits are killed, three Dalit women are raped, two Dalits’ houses are burned and fifty Dalits are assaulted by people of a higher caste.” ” High-caste Brahmins formed a private army, the Ranvir Sena, to stop communists from encouraging Dalit field workers to demand higher wages.

Delhi: 3500-yrs of massacres of Dalit-Sudra Blacks by Arya-Brahmins Who are the Untouchables? by Dr. Ambedkar Sudra Holocaust:Ongoing Genocide of millions of Dalits in India

Dalit leader Dr. Ambedkar struggled to emancipate the “untouchables” from the shackles of Hindu prescribed slavery-- the caste system.
 
Ambeekar wanted to free the Dalits & to allow them to regain their inalienable rights as human beings--highlighting the servitude, humiliation, trials & tribulations of being born in a low caste family and struggled to uplift the “untouchables”, the indigenous people, women & other disadvantaged sections of society.

In response to court directive, Modi asserted that he is ready to go to jail. This assertion is the outcome of his knowledge that in the polarzed state he will benefit despite his criminal acts. The observation so far has been that Modi has shown no remorse for what happened in Gujarat, forget apologizing for the same. The path to power for the practitioners of divisive politics is through the rivers of blood, and they know it.

 02 May, 2009, Countercurrents.org

Butcher of Gujarat
Butcher of Gujarat

So should we press for justice or fall in the trap of electoral arithmetic? The point is if we loose our basic human morality, if we compromise on the issue of rule of law, what is the worth of values of Constitution? Tragedy is not that the nation is knowing the guilt of the ilk of Modi and is watching helplessly, the tragedy is that our justice delivery system has been eroded from bottom upwards, where justice is sacrificed at the drop of a hat. The communal mind set cultivated by divisive politics, the large section of state machinery being guided by considerations other than the values of constitution is a matter of deep concern.

Gujarat Carnage: Role of Narendra Modi By Ram Puniyani,

Hinduvata genocide against Muslims in Gujarat, India Modi and massacre of Gujarat Muslims expose Bharti designs Mr. Modi the Chief Minister was implicated in these riots--supported by Indian Hotel Owners Association in America--the same group that supports Gov. Bobby Jindal

It is because of this total communalization of state apparatus that the Supreme Court had to reprimand Modi, time and over again. It is because of this that the major cases were shifted out from Gujarat. It is the same place where Zahira Sheikh changed her versions times and over again, lured by the lucre offered to her by BJP workers.

Narendar Modi being kicked; Gujarat GenocideModi bloating his chest while sitting over the corpses of thousands, is a symptom of deeper rot which has set in the society. By now first the cases are not investigated properly due to communal considerations, then when the reports nail the culprits, many of them are not touched for political considerations. Rather than having remorse and anguish on what happened to say that this Apex court direction will benefit BJP, is the most immoral and base statement which only heartless inhuman characters can make.

A heavy responsibility lies on SIT to cull the truth out, to ensure that the rule of justice and law prevails, in the communalized state apparatus in Gujarat. One hopes the victims of Gujarat will get justice, and the process of restoration of their civic and political rights begins in right earnest.Gujarat Carnage: Role of Narendra Modi By Ram Puniyani, 02 May, 2009, Countercurrents.org

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Pakistan Punch | Military Strategy |  Defensebriefs | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  پاکستاني کھاتا RUPEE NEWS  | May 19th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | اخبار روپیہ | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Secular India =Dalits under Hindu Rashtra & Muslims under Ram Raj

India: Unable to bear the Brutal Brahamanic persecution-- Buddhism survives in South East Asia Why did Buddhism disappear from South Asia? Brahmin atrocities conducted mass genocide Persecution of Buddhists in India The Manuwadi Hindus destroyed Buddhism in its own land of birth


 
 
defensebriefs

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻  | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース  | Notizie di Rupia |  PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی |

Arvind Adiga, a Brahmin from coastal Karnataka recently got the Booker Prize for his novel ‘White Tiger’. The novel describes the travails of a Dalit man from north India and how he finally triumphs over his slavery to the feudal upper caste and becomes an entrepreneur in the IT city of Bangalore.

Many reviewers have mentioned that the novel represents the struggle of a Dalit Man and his attainment of the ‘Indian Dream’. Several so called Dalit intellectuals got this book to the notice of the editor of Dalit Nation. We finally read the book and tried to put it in perspective within the overall Dalit literature and body of knowledge. What we found in this process was not in consonance with the rest of the reviewers.

The author of ‘White Tiger’ divides India into two - the Light part and the Dark part. The land of darkness is the cow belt states of North India – UP, Bihar, MP. The land of light are the states of the south especially cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad. This is the basic flaw of the novel. The author has assumed that caste equations are predominant in the northern Indian villages and the southern cities are lands of milk and honey where free will and thereby entrepreneurs can thrive. In the northern villages the destiny of Dalit men are fixed and irrevocable. The Dalits are born in such squalor where the parents forget to name their children. They finally end up as the servant, cleaners and car drivers of the upper feudal caste.

The basic problem with this premise is that it gives a clean chit to the southern cities. The editor of Dalit Nation has lived in Indian metropolitan cities and is well aware of the deeply entrenched casteism in these cities. The IT industry in Bangalore is no haven of equality (Read our article – Dalits must agitate for reservation in private sector). We have proved this time and again that the majority of the resources in the cities are appropriated by the upper caste and they control all major business and administration. But Arvind Adiga finds it the right place for the Dalit hero of the novel to escape and find emancipation.

In the whole book there is no mention of our great leader Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar. There is mention of Gandhi in a disparaging way but nowhere the messiah of Dalits is mentioned. The Brahmin author of this novel has no clue about Dalits and northern India and how much the Dalits venerate Babasaheb. The Brahmin Adiga even fails to mention the term Dalit in the whole of the novel. Dalit is a powerful term and it is through this identity all our oppressed brethren relate to each other. It is a clever ploy of the upper caste writers to avoid such words as Dalit and thereby strip them of our identity.

Babasaheb taught the mantra – ‘educate, organize and agitate’. But this novel does not contain any elements of the Dalit mantra. The Dalit hero, Balaram Halwai is uneducated and there is no effort or striving among his community towards education. They seem to be happy in their illiteracy and their impending destiny of life long slavery. And how does the dalit hero escape from the slavery of the upper castes. He works as a car driver to his American educated feudal lord and finally murders him, steals his money and escapes to Bangalore. What is the message the Dalits should take from this stupid book. That they should murder and steal and that is the only way our for them. What nonsense. Is this what Babasaheb taught them.

Why did not the hero of the novel and his community get educated , organized themselves and agitate against the upper caste people. This is what Babasaheb would have done and this is what he exhorted the Dalits to do all his life. But for the Brahmin Adiga the only way out for a Dalit is to murder, steal and live like a fugitive.

And how does our Balram Halwai gets deliverance in Bangalore. He opens a transportation company for call centres by renting out a few vehicles. Is this the success story of a Dalit. I was anticipating the Dalit hero to become a CEO of a software company. But he again ends up as driver or rather a person who hires many drivers.

Does not Arvind Adiga know that we have a Dalit Chief Minister Mayavathi, does he even know who people like Jagajivan Ram and K.R.Narayanan were. Does he know that Babasaheb had a Phd from Columbia University. He finally made the Dalit hero to become the the scum of the IT industry in Bangalore and he wants us to believe that he has found his salvation there. Babasaheb was a lawyer himself and he did not believe in murder or stealing. He believed in the law and was the first law minister of Independent India. Babasaheb was a socialist and believed that state reform is needed for the emancipation of Dalits. But here the Brahmin Adiga gives us a false hope in free market capitalism. The very same capitalism which fuels feudalism and exploitation is praised by the author. What a shame.

Novels like these should be shunned by Dalits as they deny our heritage and demonize our people. The ‘White Tiger’ is neither empowering nor can it emancipate Dalits. In short it is just a piece of junk written by an upper caste Brahmin. This piece of junk is given some Booker or Hooker prize and the upper caste readers read these kinds of novels thinking that this is the Dalit condition and they can rest in peace. The aim of Dalits is social reform through state legislation and cultural revolution. But how can a shameless pseudo intellectual scumbag Arvind Adiga understand this. All they are interested in is the Hooker prize and international readership. We dalits do not need India to be the ‘White Tiger’ we will convert it into the ‘Black Panther’. Arvind Adiga - Not White Tiger but the Black Panther

December 12, 2008 at 7:39 am · Filed under Ambedkar, Babasaheb, Brahmin, dalit·Tagged Arvind Adiga, Booker Prize, Dalit Literature

 
 
defensebriefs

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻  | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース  | Notizie di Rupia |  PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی |

Does moving the IPL cricket out of India spell the end of cricket in South Asia? Will cricket ever return to the Subcontinent? As it is, Cricket in India be besought by religious and ethnic divide that is endemic to Bharat.

Senior police sources told The Times that the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) had not consulted police or intelligence agencies before declaring its readiness to stage the IPL. “Frankly, they’ve been getting a bit ahead of themselves,” one said. “The focus has to be on the security of the crowds who would watch these matches, not on how much money they stand to make. “There is a lot more work to be done before people are confident about the logistics and the security issues.”

The Dalits of Bharat (aka India) are upset at the game anyway. This creates a huge problem for Indian cricket and the future of cricket in the Subcontinent.

George Bernard Shaw once mentioned that “Cricket is a game where eleven fools play and eleven hundred fools watch”. We at Dalitnation have changed Mr. G.B.Shaw’s words a little bit to reflect the modern Indian reality.  We say “Cricket is a Game where eleven brahmins and upper castes play and eleven million sarvajan and bahujan fools watch and eleven hundred fools in the upper caste media comment and analyse this stupid Game.”

One look at the teams will clear up all your doubts. How the pappati pot bellied Brahmins have injected the caste system. Look at the list of Brahmin Indian cricketers: Sunil Gavaskar, Ravi Shastri, Anil Kumble, Javagal Srinath, Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, Vinoo Mankad, Ajit Wadekar, G.R.Vishwanath, EAS Prassana, Ishant Sharma, Yashpal Sharma, Chethan Sharma, Manoj Prabhakar, B Chandrashekar, K Srikanth, L Sivaramakrishnan, Dilip Doshi, Sunil Joshi, Rohit Sharma, Venkatesh Prasad, Ashok Malhotra,  VVS Laxman, Murli Karthik, Sreeshashant,  Dileep Sardesai, Sanjay Manjrekar,ML Jaisimha, Sudhakar Rao, TA Shekar and many many more. The 4% brahmins in India have on an average more than 70% representation in the cricket teams. The rest are occupied by  other upper caste fellows like the jat Kapil dev, Yuvaraj Singh, Mongia, Rajputs Ajay Jadeja, Chethan Chauhan, Upper caste khatri sikhs Sidhu, B S Bedi, Harbhajan Singh. Out of fear of the muslims the sacred threadwallahs reserve some places for muslims like Azzarudin, Irfan Pathan, Pataudi, Kirmani, Munaf Patel. The indian cricket dressing room is virtually a Brahmin Agraharam. Even the recent under 19 team is full of Brahmins with surnames like Kauls and Sharmas.  Based on the analysis we have found six Brahmins in this team of eleven and the rest are upper caste and one muslim.

We dalits can be rest assured that in the next few decades our youths will spend their productive time watching and worshipping the pot bellied Brahmins and upper caste players bat and bowl. Our Dalit people will buy the products endorsed by these fair complexioned Brahmins. They will brush their teeth with the toothpastes these Brahmins endorse i.e if they have the money to buy toothpaste.

Why papati Brahmins took to cricket. The upcoming and budding Dalit Intellectual Siriyavan Anand has analyzed this so well. We hope brother S Anand continues to write on engrossing Dalit issues and we wish him all the best. Brahmins who never bothered to play any games and who spent all their lives memorizing the stupid Vedic texts found the leisurely game of cricket most suitable to their lazy temperament. Cricket is one of the most laziest games fit for people who have a lot of time to spare and not physically taxing. In cricket unlike in other sports there is less contact between players. This appeals to the Brahmin practice of untouchability.  No wonder young Brahmin boys are sent to coaching camps by their parents to get into the cricket team.  The Brahmin selectors, the players and Brahmin commentators form a mutual admiration society.

Now where are the Dalits represented in the cricket team. We  had only few dalit cricketers in all these years Balwanth Paloo ( the cricketer who Inspired Babasaheb), Eknath Solkar and Vinod Kambli. Nobody remembers Balwanth Paloo. Why should the pappati remember them. They only remember the twice born dwijas. The Maharastrian dalit Solkar was made to Field close to the batsman and he had to take so many blows. No brahmin wanted to Field there. Vinod Kambli created a world record with the Brahmin Tendulkar. But where is tendulkar now and Kambli is completely forgotten. He was dropped from the team just because he was a Dalit, so that the Brahmin Tendulkar can be made into a hero. The Brahmins do not even have sportsman and team spirit. Look at the way they think about their own records and scores. How could Gavaskar and tendulkar score so many centuries while the team did not win many matches. For the Brahmins the country comes secondary, it is the caste and personal desires which come first. Brahmins whose physiques are not so great are made into macho heros by the media. Ambedkar mentions about how genetically inferior these Brahmins are with respect to their physiques. But our strong Dalit-bhaujans don’t even have a place in the national team. It is a shame.

In more physically vigorous sports like Hockey and Football the Brahmins don’t qualify so we don’t find the papans there. They would collapse due to exhaustion if they played these games. They need Dalits and Bahujans to play these games. But these dalits don’t get any money for playing hockey and football. The Hockey and football federations have no money. All the money from the upper caste Business sponsors are given to this filthy casteist game of cricket.

The dalits are made to feel inferior every time they watch a cricket match. There are movies like Lagaan which insults Dalits. Siriyavan Anand writes in detail about these filthy casteist movie. The hero Aamir Khan who is the upper caste Bhuvan is the de facto leader of the team. The untouchable Kachra finds his place in the team because he is handicapped. Why should the dalits be portrayed as physically handicapped. The Brahmin director Ashutoish Gowarikar wants to portray that Dalits are a physically inferior race. We dalits should be watchful of these Brahmin vultures. Bhuvan the hero is patronising with Kachra. We Dalits need no patrons we should demand that our rights should be fulfilled.  Kachra’s talent comes only because of his handicap. In the end they even make the upper caste Bhuvan to score the winning six.

Our warning to our Dalit brothers is beware of cricket. Stop watching this upper caste game. We dalits should focus on physically demanding games like Hockey and Football. Once again the editorial team of Dalit Nation would like to commend the budding intellectual Siriyavan Anand and we hope that one day he will become as great as Babasaheb, V.T. Rajashekar and Kancha Ilaiah. The eleven Brahmins and eleven million fools

March 7, 2008 at 9:27 am · Filed under Ambedkar, Brahmin, dalit ·Tagged Brahmins,brahmins in cricket, Caste system, cricket, Dalits, Indian Hockey, Siriyavan Anand

 
 
defensebriefs
23 March 2009 @ 10:09 pm

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March 23rd, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Old Socialists never die--they just smell that way!

The Socialists in Pakistan are empowered by the turmoil in the region, the schism between the rich and the poor, the growing disenchantment with America and the fear of the Taliban. There is a lot of discussion about the systems. Many feel that capitalism in a tailspin does not offer solutions for the third world. Others want to seek new avenues for development and seek solace in the economic growth of China and Russia. Some even eulogize Cuba and venerate Venezuela. Most are disenchanted with the corruption of the ruling elite.

Lenin was very clear in this relationship between the revolutionary vanguard and the working class. In "Left wing Communism", Lenin writes:

"If you want to help 'the masses' and to win the sympathy and support of 'the masses', you must not fear difficulties, you must not fear the pinpricks, chicanery, insults and persecution on the part of the 'leaders' (who being opportunists and social chauvinists, are in most cases directly or indirectly connected with the bourgeoisie and the police), but must imperatively work wherever the masses are to be found. You must be capable of every sacrifice, of overcoming the greatest obstacles in order to carry on agitation and propaganda systematically, perseveringly, persistently and patiently, precisely in those institutions, societies and associations - even the most ultra-reactionary - in which proletarian or semi proletarian masses are to be found." (Left wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder, Lenin, pp. 61)

A mass revolutionary upheaval in the next period in Pakistan will outshine even the 1968-69 revolution, which created and gave stature to the tradition of the PPP. Such movements are iconoclastic in character, they create new revolutionary traditions that change societies, reshape destiny and transform history. A revolutionary tendency can play a decisive role in such events.


Even with the relatively small forces of revolutionary Marxism in Pakistan, a subjective factor can give organization and direction to such a movement. Such a revolutionary upheaval can overthrow capitalism, destroy the roots of religious fundamentalism and obscurantism, smash the shackles of feudalism and remove the yoke of imperialist stranglehold and exploitation. Such a feat can only be accomplished through a Socialist Revolution. A socialist victory in Pakistan would open the floodgates of revolutionary upheavals across the South Asian subcontinent from Afghanistan to Burma where the masses are seething with revolt and yearning for a socialist transformation. Socialist dot Net

Several factors led to the defeat and retreat of the Marxist parties in the land of the Indus. Many feel that Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto had used and abused the leftist forces and them left them out to dry.

the PPP rode to power in the wake of the anti-Ayub movement of 1968-69. This was the height of the Vietnam War (the Tet Offensive had taken place in 1968), the Chinese Cultural Revolution and the Anti-Imperialist movement in the heartland of Imperialism, i.e. the USA. In Pakistan, the movement was lead by the radical sections of the petty-bourgeoise strata with its allies in the working class and the peasantry. Seeing which way the movement was turning, the PPP put the popular slogan ‘Maang Raha Hai Har Insaan - Roti, Kapra aur Makaan’ (Every human being is demanding Bread, Clothing and Shelter!) as well as the slogan of ‘Socialism avay hee avay’ (Socialism is bound to come!). The inclusion of what became the socialism clause are to read against this background and it is immaterial how much the PPP remained true to its word, the point is that the term occupies a central place within the constitution and it is important for its defenders to entreat it. The Red Diary

The judicial killing of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the other was ascent of Zia Ul Haq was the final nail in the coffin of the Hammer and Sickle in the land of the Crescent and Star. After the defeat of the Soviet Armies, and implosion of USSR, the leftist forces in Pakistan went into hiding and hibernation.

Before 1968, politics and political parties were all about the ruling class. There was no mention of the working class and its political role, in the media or among the intelligentsia. But that all changed. The working class rose onto the political scene with an exceptional revolutionary movement, which started as protests against the regime of Ayub Khan led by students in November 1968, growing to a general strike led by the working class within a few months.

Workers started to occupy factories and peasants took over lands from feudal lords. In some areas, the peasantry organised armed struggle against the landlords. Tenants refused to pay rents. The working class took control of the cities and started to run the administration. A few cities remained under workers’ control for more than two weeks. Socialist revolution could be smelt in the air. Socialism was the main slogan in the movement. The ruling class was terrified.

The founder of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Zulifqar Ali Bhutto, came to its rescue. There was no revolutionary party and leadership able to carry through the revolution and overthrow capitalism and feudalism to establish a workers’ state. Bhutto took advantage of the situation and derailed the potential socialist revolution into a reformist democratic movement. The working class lost this opportunity and later paid the price for this failure. Respective regimes viciously attacked the most militant and conscious layers of the working class, introducing laws to prevent strikes and the formation of unions, and banning trade union activities in many sectors of the economy.

The trade union movement started to decline in the 1980s and has weakened significantly since, the last 15 years being the most difficult time. The collapse of Stalinist Russia and the Stalinist states of Eastern Europe also affected the trade union movement. Many left-wing unions, federations and their leaders fully capitulated to capitalism and started preaching free-market economy to their ranks. Leaders betrayed many struggles against privatisation and neo-liberalism. The main trade union leaderships also adopted the policy of compromise and opportunism against government attacks on workers and trade unions. Now, only 3% of workers are affiliated with trade unions.

The trade union movement is at a crossroad. Compromise and capitulation will lead to further weakness and decline. But struggle and organised resistance can provide strength and much needed confidence to the labour movement. And the numbers of trade unions have begun to increase as new sections of the working class have started to organise. Some important struggles and strikes have emerged in last few years, including the historic strike of PTCL (telecommunications) and textile workers. Teachers are also fighting for their rights, and industrial workers have won some important battles. In next few years, there will be a resurgence of workers’ struggles and strikes.

Zia Ul Haq's patronage of the Ultra Right and the religious press the Leninist and Maoists further underground. The drying up of funding sources from Moscow eliminated the Mazdoor Kisan Party and its breakaway offshoots. Even the Bhashani and Wali Khan's National Awami Party felt the pressure and lost its traditional voting block in the Western provinces of Pakistan. Many had thought that they were dead as a door nail.

...

THE PAKISTAN PEOPLE’S Party was founded in 1967 with just 35 people. Zulifqar Ali Bhutto was the founding chairman. He was a big feudal lord from Sindh and served as minister in the military government of Ayub Khan. He was a clever politician. He correctly understood the mood of the masses and put forward a radical programme with socialist slogans. He put forward demands for bread, houses and clothes for everyone. He also talked about a socialist planned economy and a classless society. In the absence of an organised left party and movement, he came forward with radical anti-capitalist and anti-feudal slogans.

The PPP became the largest political party in Pakistan in just a few months, in the aftermath of the revolutionary movement of the working class. It became the largest party in West Pakistan, while the Awami League trounced the other parties to win a landslide in East Pakistan in the first ever elections in 1970. The military and civil establishment refused to hand over power to the Awami League and this resulted in a civil war and then the separation of East Pakistan (now called Bangladesh) in 1971. Bhutto became the leader of the rest of Pakistan. He came to power with popular support, introducing a few reforms in the early period of his rule, and nationalising more than 70% of the economy.

But he was frightened of a strong working class and used repressive measures against the trade unions. He betrayed the working class and started attacking its advanced layers. His support started to decrease in the last years of his rule. The military organised a coup against him in 1977 after a violent right-wing movement against him. He was later hanged by the military government. His hanging again made him popular with the masses, because it showed he had refused to compromise with the military dictator.Socialism Today

With a resurgent Moscow, a depressed Capitalist world, and the Taliban at the Gates, many of the "Surkas" (Reds), as they are known in Pakistan have come to the forefront. The Reds even a band called "Lal" which is perpetuating its brand of populist socialism egged on by closet and hidden Socialists like Ahtizaz Ahsan. Even Mubbashair Hasan, the Left's darling and the Minister of Health of Zufiqar Ali Bhutto is now out in the open.

It is pedagogical to note that that old Socialists have come out of the woodwork. Clearly the ANP which ha dbeen rejected by the Pakhtuns for decades now is in power. Amazingly the Khans of ANP/NAP are ready to deal with the "TTP" of Swat even though the TTP is the antithesis of the the socialist and secular policies of the founding fathers of the NAP.

Will the future Pakhtuns owe their allegiance to Moscow or Mecca or Mao? This is the latent million Dollar question that will be answered in the coming weeks.

Article 3 and Karl Marx

The ‘Socialism clause’ is Article 3 of the Constitution (above clause 6 for High treason that no one tires of mentioned!) entitled ‘Elimination of exploitation’ and reads:

The State shall ensure the elimination of all forms of exploitation and the gradual fulfilment of the fundamental principle, from each according to his ability, to each according to his work.

The above quote is taken from Marx’s classic work ‘The Critique of the Gotha Program’ where he explicates how the principle of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” can
only be realized in the Classless, Stateless Communist society where material production abounds and for socialist society, arising fresh out of the birth pangs of Capitalism, a better measure would be ‘from
each according to his ability, to each according to the labour performed’. Consequently, the above phrase was included as the cornerstone of the Constitution of the USSR, the first Socialist Country on earth. Despite not actually materializing, Socialism is definitely a part of our constitution.
The Red Diary

The left in Pakistan heralds Mohammad Ali Jinnah as a secular cultural Muslim. The right points to his advocacy for a Muslim homeland and butters up this monograph with his statements about the Pakistani constitution derived out the Quran. The left points to Jinnah's earlier lifestyle. And so it goes.

‘Restoration’ and Socialism

It is therefore abundantly clear that the question of the restoration of the 1973 Constitution is invariably tied to the question of Socialism in Pakistan. The fact that it has not been mentioned within
the numerous debates of the past one year may tell us something about the class composition of the Lawyers movement; it may also explain why the broad masses of the workers and peasants of Pakistan, although definitely inspired by the heroic struggle of the lawyers and their allies, have not actively participated in the Defence of the Constitution. The Radicals in the Democratic movement need to bring Article 3 to the fore in order to connect the Constitutional question with the popular classes, as well as to see whether the class loyalties of the ‘Constitutionalists’ take precedence over their Defence of the Constitution. Any Takers?
The Red Diary

The implications of the Left vs. Right battle in Pakistan reverberate around the world. Pakistan was the most loyal US ally during the Cold War. It was the front line state which led to the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan which many attribute led to the implosion of the USSR. Pakistanis and the 2 million that died fighting Moscow helped the USA destroy their biggest enemy. That help went unappreciated and was rewarded with en years of sanctions for the Pakistanis.

Today the memory of the non-delivery of the F-16s, that had been paid for with $450 million of Pakistan cash plus the CIAs drone bombing adds to the growing Anti-Americanism. The left in Pakistan plays on this growing Anti-Americanism and propagates a Socialistic Pakistan. Amazingly this has much appeal for the Socialistic Elite as well as the oppressed poor.

The only class which can bring change and transform the lives of the working masses is the working class. Socialism is the only viable system to replace capitalism. The working class has not yet started to move but once it starts the whole political scenario will be different. There is a 43 million strong working class, one third of the total population. The Pakistani working class and masses have showed again and again that they have the potential, courage and capability to conduct a revolutionary struggle against the rotten rulers. The working class needs its own revolutionary party and leadership to organise the struggle. Such a party, with a clear programme, strategy and tactics, and mass support, can win the future for the masses.

Pakistan is heading towards another showdown between the ruling and working classes. The outcome of this showdown will determine the future of this country and for the masses. The working class cannot take full advantage of independence and cannot enjoy real freedom without the overthrow of capitalism and feudalism. Socialism Today

Pakistan is at crossroads. It is threatened by the religious fervor of the Extremist Right and held hostage to the machination of the Left whose purse stings may be held far from the shore of Karachi.

The fanaticism of the religious right is matched by the extremism of the irreligiousness of the fundamentalist left. The Pro-Leninists are at the throats of the the Pro-Jeffersonians who are odds of the the Pro-Caliphists. All factions are also influenced by the ground realities where Iran, Russia, the USA, China are pulling the strings.

Bharat (aka India) scared out of it wits, is pushing for a secular government in Islamabad and Kabul. Washington wants to replicate Jeffersonian democracy in the land of the Indus and the Amu Darya. Moscow waits in the wings to incorporate Afghanistan into its near-abroad.

If one can look into the seeds of time and see which will grow and which will not, one has to see the writing on the wall. The writing on the wall spells the "day after". The "Day after" the US leaves Afghanistan is victory for those who want a Caliphate in Kabul. The "Day after" the America is thrown out of Kabul spells a victory of the anti-imperialist forces of the Pakhtuns. The "Day after' defines a prosperous South Asia for the freedom loving Pro-Western Pakistanis. The "Day after" describes a turning of the tide for he Marxists who had warned the USA of intervening in Afghanistan.

 
 
defensebriefs

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March 23rd, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Old Socialists never die--they just smell that way!

The Socialists in Pakistan are empowered by the turmoil in the region, the schism between the rich and the poor, the growing disenchantment with America and the fear of the Taliban. There is a lot of discussion about the systems. Many feel that capitalism in a tailspin does not offer solutions for the third world. Others want to seek new avenues for development and seek solace in the economic growth of China and Russia. Some even eulogize Cuba and venerate Venezuela. Most are disenchanted with the corruption of the ruling elite.

Lenin was very clear in this relationship between the revolutionary vanguard and the working class. In "Left wing Communism", Lenin writes:

"If you want to help 'the masses' and to win the sympathy and support of 'the masses', you must not fear difficulties, you must not fear the pinpricks, chicanery, insults and persecution on the part of the 'leaders' (who being opportunists and social chauvinists, are in most cases directly or indirectly connected with the bourgeoisie and the police), but must imperatively work wherever the masses are to be found. You must be capable of every sacrifice, of overcoming the greatest obstacles in order to carry on agitation and propaganda systematically, perseveringly, persistently and patiently, precisely in those institutions, societies and associations - even the most ultra-reactionary - in which proletarian or semi proletarian masses are to be found." (Left wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder, Lenin, pp. 61)

A mass revolutionary upheaval in the next period in Pakistan will outshine even the 1968-69 revolution, which created and gave stature to the tradition of the PPP. Such movements are iconoclastic in character, they create new revolutionary traditions that change societies, reshape destiny and transform history. A revolutionary tendency can play a decisive role in such events.


Even with the relatively small forces of revolutionary Marxism in Pakistan, a subjective factor can give organization and direction to such a movement. Such a revolutionary upheaval can overthrow capitalism, destroy the roots of religious fundamentalism and obscurantism, smash the shackles of feudalism and remove the yoke of imperialist stranglehold and exploitation. Such a feat can only be accomplished through a Socialist Revolution. A socialist victory in Pakistan would open the floodgates of revolutionary upheavals across the South Asian subcontinent from Afghanistan to Burma where the masses are seething with revolt and yearning for a socialist transformation. Socialist dot Net

Several factors led to the defeat and retreat of the Marxist parties in the land of the Indus. Many feel that Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto had used and abused the leftist forces and them left them out to dry.

the PPP rode to power in the wake of the anti-Ayub movement of 1968-69. This was the height of the Vietnam War (the Tet Offensive had taken place in 1968), the Chinese Cultural Revolution and the Anti-Imperialist movement in the heartland of Imperialism, i.e. the USA. In Pakistan, the movement was lead by the radical sections of the petty-bourgeoise strata with its allies in the working class and the peasantry. Seeing which way the movement was turning, the PPP put the popular slogan ‘Maang Raha Hai Har Insaan - Roti, Kapra aur Makaan’ (Every human being is demanding Bread, Clothing and Shelter!) as well as the slogan of ‘Socialism avay hee avay’ (Socialism is bound to come!). The inclusion of what became the socialism clause are to read against this background and it is immaterial how much the PPP remained true to its word, the point is that the term occupies a central place within the constitution and it is important for its defenders to entreat it. The Red Diary

The judicial killing of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the other was ascent of Zia Ul Haq was the final nail in the coffin of the Hammer and Sickle in the land of the Crescent and Star. After the defeat of the Soviet Armies, and implosion of USSR, the leftist forces in Pakistan went into hiding and hibernation.

Before 1968, politics and political parties were all about the ruling class. There was no mention of the working class and its political role, in the media or among the intelligentsia. But that all changed. The working class rose onto the political scene with an exceptional revolutionary movement, which started as protests against the regime of Ayub Khan led by students in November 1968, growing to a general strike led by the working class within a few months.

Workers started to occupy factories and peasants took over lands from feudal lords. In some areas, the peasantry organised armed struggle against the landlords. Tenants refused to pay rents. The working class took control of the cities and started to run the administration. A few cities remained under workers’ control for more than two weeks. Socialist revolution could be smelt in the air. Socialism was the main slogan in the movement. The ruling class was terrified.

The founder of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Zulifqar Ali Bhutto, came to its rescue. There was no revolutionary party and leadership able to carry through the revolution and overthrow capitalism and feudalism to establish a workers’ state. Bhutto took advantage of the situation and derailed the potential socialist revolution into a reformist democratic movement. The working class lost this opportunity and later paid the price for this failure. Respective regimes viciously attacked the most militant and conscious layers of the working class, introducing laws to prevent strikes and the formation of unions, and banning trade union activities in many sectors of the economy.

The trade union movement started to decline in the 1980s and has weakened significantly since, the last 15 years being the most difficult time. The collapse of Stalinist Russia and the Stalinist states of Eastern Europe also affected the trade union movement. Many left-wing unions, federations and their leaders fully capitulated to capitalism and started preaching free-market economy to their ranks. Leaders betrayed many struggles against privatisation and neo-liberalism. The main trade union leaderships also adopted the policy of compromise and opportunism against government attacks on workers and trade unions. Now, only 3% of workers are affiliated with trade unions.

The trade union movement is at a crossroad. Compromise and capitulation will lead to further weakness and decline. But struggle and organised resistance can provide strength and much needed confidence to the labour movement. And the numbers of trade unions have begun to increase as new sections of the working class have started to organise. Some important struggles and strikes have emerged in last few years, including the historic strike of PTCL (telecommunications) and textile workers. Teachers are also fighting for their rights, and industrial workers have won some important battles. In next few years, there will be a resurgence of workers’ struggles and strikes.

Zia Ul Haq's patronage of the Ultra Right and the religious press the Leninist and Maoists further underground. The drying up of funding sources from Moscow eliminated the Mazdoor Kisan Party and its breakaway offshoots. Even the Bhashani and Wali Khan's National Awami Party felt the pressure and lost its traditional voting block in the Western provinces of Pakistan. Many had thought that they were dead as a door nail.

...

THE PAKISTAN PEOPLE’S Party was founded in 1967 with just 35 people. Zulifqar Ali Bhutto was the founding chairman. He was a big feudal lord from Sindh and served as minister in the military government of Ayub Khan. He was a clever politician. He correctly understood the mood of the masses and put forward a radical programme with socialist slogans. He put forward demands for bread, houses and clothes for everyone. He also talked about a socialist planned economy and a classless society. In the absence of an organised left party and movement, he came forward with radical anti-capitalist and anti-feudal slogans.

The PPP became the largest political party in Pakistan in just a few months, in the aftermath of the revolutionary movement of the working class. It became the largest party in West Pakistan, while the Awami League trounced the other parties to win a landslide in East Pakistan in the first ever elections in 1970. The military and civil establishment refused to hand over power to the Awami League and this resulted in a civil war and then the separation of East Pakistan (now called Bangladesh) in 1971. Bhutto became the leader of the rest of Pakistan. He came to power with popular support, introducing a few reforms in the early period of his rule, and nationalising more than 70% of the economy.

But he was frightened of a strong working class and used repressive measures against the trade unions. He betrayed the working class and started attacking its advanced layers. His support started to decrease in the last years of his rule. The military organised a coup against him in 1977 after a violent right-wing movement against him. He was later hanged by the military government. His hanging again made him popular with the masses, because it showed he had refused to compromise with the military dictator.Socialism Today

With a resurgent Moscow, a depressed Capitalist world, and the Taliban at the Gates, many of the "Surkas" (Reds), as they are known in Pakistan have come to the forefront. The Reds even a band called "Lal" which is perpetuating its brand of populist socialism egged on by closet and hidden Socialists like Ahtizaz Ahsan. Even Mubbashair Hasan, the Left's darling and the Minister of Health of Zufiqar Ali Bhutto is now out in the open.

It is pedagogical to note that that old Socialists have come out of the woodwork. Clearly the ANP which ha dbeen rejected by the Pakhtuns for decades now is in power. Amazingly the Khans of ANP/NAP are ready to deal with the "TTP" of Swat even though the TTP is the antithesis of the the socialist and secular policies of the founding fathers of the NAP.

Will the future Pakhtuns owe their allegiance to Moscow or Mecca or Mao? This is the latent million Dollar question that will be answered in the coming weeks.

Article 3 and Karl Marx

The ‘Socialism clause’ is Article 3 of the Constitution (above clause 6 for High treason that no one tires of mentioned!) entitled ‘Elimination of exploitation’ and reads:

The State shall ensure the elimination of all forms of exploitation and the gradual fulfilment of the fundamental principle, from each according to his ability, to each according to his work.

The above quote is taken from Marx’s classic work ‘The Critique of the Gotha Program’ where he explicates how the principle of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” can
only be realized in the Classless, Stateless Communist society where material production abounds and for socialist society, arising fresh out of the birth pangs of Capitalism, a better measure would be ‘from
each according to his ability, to each according to the labour performed’. Consequently, the above phrase was included as the cornerstone of the Constitution of the USSR, the first Socialist Country on earth. Despite not actually materializing, Socialism is definitely a part of our constitution.
The Red Diary

The left in Pakistan heralds Mohammad Ali Jinnah as a secular cultural Muslim. The right points to his advocacy for a Muslim homeland and butters up this monograph with his statements about the Pakistani constitution derived out the Quran. The left points to Jinnah's earlier lifestyle. And so it goes.

‘Restoration’ and Socialism

It is therefore abundantly clear that the question of the restoration of the 1973 Constitution is invariably tied to the question of Socialism in Pakistan. The fact that it has not been mentioned within
the numerous debates of the past one year may tell us something about the class composition of the Lawyers movement; it may also explain why the broad masses of the workers and peasants of Pakistan, although definitely inspired by the heroic struggle of the lawyers and their allies, have not actively participated in the Defence of the Constitution. The Radicals in the Democratic movement need to bring Article 3 to the fore in order to connect the Constitutional question with the popular classes, as well as to see whether the class loyalties of the ‘Constitutionalists’ take precedence over their Defence of the Constitution. Any Takers?
The Red Diary

The implications of the Left vs. Right battle in Pakistan reverberate around the world. Pakistan was the most loyal US ally during the Cold War. It was the front line state which led to the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan which many attribute led to the implosion of the USSR. Pakistanis and the 2 million that died fighting Moscow helped the USA destroy their biggest enemy. That help went unappreciated and was rewarded with en years of sanctions for the Pakistanis.

Today the memory of the non-delivery of the F-16s, that had been paid for with $450 million of Pakistan cash plus the CIAs drone bombing adds to the growing Anti-Americanism. The left in Pakistan plays on this growing Anti-Americanism and propagates a Socialistic Pakistan. Amazingly this has much appeal for the Socialistic Elite as well as the oppressed poor.

The only class which can bring change and transform the lives of the working masses is the working class. Socialism is the only viable system to replace capitalism. The working class has not yet started to move but once it starts the whole political scenario will be different. There is a 43 million strong working class, one third of the total population. The Pakistani working class and masses have showed again and again that they have the potential, courage and capability to conduct a revolutionary struggle against the rotten rulers. The working class needs its own revolutionary party and leadership to organise the struggle. Such a party, with a clear programme, strategy and tactics, and mass support, can win the future for the masses.

Pakistan is heading towards another showdown between the ruling and working classes. The outcome of this showdown will determine the future of this country and for the masses. The working class cannot take full advantage of independence and cannot enjoy real freedom without the overthrow of capitalism and feudalism. Socialism Today

Pakistan is at crossroads. It is threatened by the religious fervor of the Extremist Right and held hostage to the machination of the Left whose purse stings may be held far from the shore of Karachi.

The fanaticism of the religious right is matched by the extremism of the irreligiousness of the fundamentalist left. The Pro-Leninists are at the throats of the the Pro-Jeffersonians who are odds of the the Pro-Caliphists. All factions are also influenced by the ground realities where Iran, Russia, the USA, China are pulling the strings.

Bharat (aka India) scared out of it wits, is pushing for a secular government in Islamabad and Kabul. Washington wants to replicate Jeffersonian democracy in the land of the Indus and the Amu Darya. Moscow waits in the wings to incorporate Afghanistan into its near-abroad.

If one can look into the seeds of time and see which will grow and which will not, one has to see the writing on the wall. The writing on the wall spells the "day after". The "Day after" the US leaves Afghanistan is victory for those who want a Caliphate in Kabul. The "Day after" the America is thrown out of Kabul spells a victory of the anti-imperialist forces of the Pakhtuns. The "Day after' defines a prosperous South Asia for the freedom loving Pro-Western Pakistanis. The "Day after" describes a turning of the tide for he Marxists who had warned the USA of intervening in Afghanistan.

 
 
defensebriefs

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March 11th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Another article about the end of US hegemony has been published in the Atlantic Monthly. Imperial blindness: Another Empire stuck in Af-Pak quagmire unable to extricate itself out of Kipling’s hell. The US has squandered it wealth and prestige in the past decade. The Unipolar world is ending. There are clear signs of a resurgent Russia and a rising China. Parag Khanna says that "India has missed the boat". Europe is a major contender for a World Power. It seems likely that the hegemony of the sole superpower will be replaced by a world with at least four major poles--The USA, Russia, Europe, and China. There may be other contenders and those who want to be counted, but the the quad will rule the world. Each node of the quad will try to manipulate other smaller powers to their advantage. For example during the Bush Administration the US tried to use Bharat (aka India) a counterweight to China. The Obama-Clinton policy is to build a strong relationship with China.

People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill

Can Obama pull US out of the AfPak quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)
Can Obama duplicate Swat peace deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan

The last time the political tectonic plates collided, the eartquake was felt all over South Asia, Eastern Europe and in Latin America. After the defeat of the Soviets in Afghanistan the USSR imploded under the drunk leadership of Mr. Yeltsin, and was reduced to the status of Latvia and Estonia. It was ignored and humiliated. A resurgent Russia can be analogized to a resurgent Germany after Versailles.

In the past two decades, America was the undisputed leader and the main military power on the planet. Parag Khanna is one of those that feel the USA squandered away that leadership and missed a golden opportunity to lead by example and with moral authority. Python swallows alligator and explodes: Lessons from the Peloponnesian War.

It is 2016, and the Hillary Clinton or John McCain or Barack Obama administration is nearing the end of its second term. America has pulled out of Iraq but has about 20,000 troops in the independent state of Kurdistan, as well as warships anchored at Bahrain and an Air Force presence in Qatar. Afghanistan is stable; Iran is nuclear. China has absorbed Taiwan and is steadily increasing its naval presence around the Pacific Rim and, from the Pakistani port of Gwadar, on the Arabian Sea. The European Union has expanded to well over 30 members and has secure oil and gas flows from North Africa, Russia and the Caspian Sea, as well as substantial nuclear energy. America’s standing in the world remains in steady decline. Paragh Khanna

Castro on collapse of US Imperialism. Decries “Law of jungle”

Why? Weren’t we supposed to reconnect with the United Nations and reaffirm to the world that America can, and should, lead it to collective security and prosperity? Indeed, improvements to America’s image may or may not occur, but either way, they mean little. Condoleezza Rice has said America has no “permanent enemies,” but it has no permanent friends either. Many saw the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as the symbols of a global American imperialism; in fact, they were signs of imperial overstretch. Every expenditure has weakened America’s armed forces, and each assertion of power has awakened resistance in the form of terrorist networks, insurgent groups and “asymmetric” weapons like suicide bombers. America’s unipolar moment has inspired diplomatic and financial countermovements to block American bullying and construct an alternate world order. That new global order has arrived, and there is precious little Clinton or McCain or Obama could do to resist its growth.The Geopolitical Marketplace

While the Obama administration seeks to improve America’s position vis-à-vis Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel-Palestine, Europe, and Asia, the most critical foreign-policy front of all – the home front—is looking brittle. This development is new, as for almost seven decades – ever since Pearl Harbor—policymakers have taken for granted that the homefront would cooperate with military missions and expenditures. America could build ships, planes, and tanks, and assert itself as the pivotal outside power in many parts of the world, and the home front (despite sometimes outspoken political opposition, as during the Vietnam War) would financially support those efforts. This held true from the time of the end of the Great Depression right up until the onset of our current great recession. The emergencies of World War II and the early Cold War years, coupled with a constantly expanding economy, allowed the home front to write blank checks for our endeavors abroad. But the big question in foreign policy today is, Will this continue in the face of the greatest economic crisis since the 1930s?

Soon after the Iraq war turned nasty in 2006, the American people lost their stomach for involvement there. It was only because the surge paid fairly quick dividends, which got Iraq off the front pages, that public disquiet was reduced to low-level muttering. But that was before the economic crisis hit. Given the state of people’s retirement accounts and job prospects, where will the public be regarding Afghanistan a year from now? I’d guess that the Administration has no more than a year to show striking progress in Afghanistan before the public starts to growl like it did at the Bush Administration in the 2006 mid-term elections.

But Afghanistan is only the most obvious potential casualty of the recession. Also at stake are the expensive weapons programs and air and sea platforms that allow the United States to sustain its position as a global military hegemon. Regardless of what happens on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. dominates the air and the main sea lines of communication (SLOCs). Ultimately, it is this fact that makes this country the preeminent global power that it is, and gives our diplomacy the heft it requires to sit at the front of the table at critical gatherings around the world. Yet maintaining that position doesn’t just cost money, it costs lots and lots of money—billions, not millions. Why the recession could spell the end of American dominance by Robert D. Kaplan The Shrinking Superpower. Robert D. Kaplan is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

Already the first signs of friction on the world scene are being felt. The Russian invasion of Georgia as a result of the NATO expansion, the Chinese rebuff of Delhi, the US-Beijing Naval tension, and the Chinese request to America to stop the destabilization of South Asia are some examples of a changing world.

The geopolitical marketplace will decide which will lead the 21st century.The key second-world countries in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, South America, the Middle East and Southeast Asia are more than just “emerging markets.” If you include China, they hold a majority of the world’s foreign-exchange reserves and savings, and their spending power is making them the global economy’s most important new consumer markets and thus engines of global growth - not replacing the United States but not dependent on it either. I.P.O.’s from the so-called BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) alone accounted for 39 percent of the volume raised globally in 2007, just one indicator of second-world countries’ rising importance in corporate finance - even after you subtract China. When Tata of India is vying to buy Jaguar, you know the landscape of power has changed. Second-world countries are also fast becoming hubs for oil and timber, manufacturing and services, airlines and infrastructure - all this in a geopolitical marketplace that puts their loyalty up for grabs to any of the Big Three, and increasingly to all of them at the same time. Second-world states won’t be subdued: in the age of network power, they won’t settle for being mere export markets. Rather, they are the places where the Big Three must invest heavily and to which they must relocate productive assets to maintain influence.Parag Khanna is a senior research fellow in the American Strategy Program of the New America Foundation. This essay is adapted from his book, “The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order,” Random House.

  • Hainan Naval incident: Beijing to USA: Can’t you read the sign? "Sea of China" is Chinese territory
  • Justifying the Banality of Occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan: The Thinktanks attempt to complete the circle of complicity between a sycophantic press, and a non-inquisitive servile public. The nation is forced to accept the only argument that it is being repeatedly inundated with
  • Can the Ides of March eliminate Zardocracy: What’s in store for the PPPP in Pakistan?
  • Pulling the US out of the AfPak quicksand? Choosing China and Pakistan over India

    Fixing Afpak: Inability to define exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophy in Kabul Obama's sane policy: Negotating with the Taliban Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months Obama to unveil new policy: Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan
    Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view Peek into Obama’s brains: Bruce Reidel on Pakistan Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan
    Obama advisor Weinbaum predicts total Afghan policy review: Sees focus on talks & Reconciliation Afghanistan: Gen. Petraeus’ Pakistani advisers: Indians jittery Obama adviser gives deep insights into new Afghan policy

    The fact that the public has docilely accepted this arrangement for so long does not mean that it will continue to do so. Despite the many new billions that President Obama’s budget allocates for jump-starting the economy, he intends to substantially cut the Pentagon’s money-line. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has warned that the financial “spigot that opened on 9/11…is closing.” Gates might more accurately have said it is the financial spigot that opened following Pearl Harbor that’s closing. For the only interruption to the succession of high budgets the Pentagon has enjoyed since Pearl Harbor occurred during the 1990s, when America felt itself at peace, with no overbearing security threats. That decade saw the Navy lose almost half of its ships. The 1990s may provide only a taste of what is to come as the recession deepens and elongates, leading to tectonic changes in the public mood.

    Conservatives are already protesting the short shrift President Obama seems to be giving the Pentagon, but they are crying into the wind. The President’s approval rating is exceedingly high. The lesson seems to be that the President and the Democrats can do what they want with Pentagon budgets, and, if the economy doesn’t pull out of its tailspin relatively soon, they will.

    Nonetheless, I do not expect any sudden slashing of defense budgets. What I foresee is a more gradual siphoning of money away from vital programs over the next decade, even as China, India, and other countries enlarge their navies and other forces. This will not necessarily lead to a security dilemma for the U.S., but it will certainly lead to a multipolar world and the end of American dominance. The only development that could change this equation would be a new and sudden threat – and one other than mass-casualty terrorism. For while terrorism would lead to larger budgets for the intelligence establishment, the conventional air and sea platforms from which great powers are made would not be affected.

    Defense policy will be increasingly geared toward protecting the homeland, even as globalization makes for a smaller, more intricately connected world. America, in the final analysis, will be better protected, even as its global reach wanes. That is what to expect if the recession is still with us a year from now. Why the recession could spell the end of American dominance by Robert D. Kaplan The Shrinking Superpower. Robert D. Kaplan is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

     

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March 11th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

    US AfPak policy review results mimic Chinese demads given to Hillary Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived. ~Abraham Lincoln In 1821 The Taliban was a construct of the CIA and was armed by the CIA:--Congressman Dana Rohrabacher Obama's Vietnam & Cambodiazation of the Afghan war Solutions to "Obama's Vietnam" Kabul: The Final Spring Offensive? End of NATO? Afghanistan: The writing is on the wall. Can Obama read it? UK Brig. Smith: “We’re not going to win this [Afghan] war”
    Failure and Defeat in Afghanistan: Inevitable Frustration & misdirected Payback for ally Pakistan US Charge of the Light Brigade into Pakistan is a US failure and has to stop
    Pakistan's do more list for the USA Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan & Swat run by Taliban Huge Migraine for India
    Facing the Khyber poltergeist & Ganges hobgoblin NATO war: UK 1880 defeats in Afghanistan
    “Charge of the Light Brigade” in Afghanistan AGAIN: Unfortunately the lessons of the unmitigated disaster of “Auckland’s Folly”, (First Anglo-Afghan War 1838–42) have not been taught to the Oxbridge students.
    Bin Laden used Reagan’s USSR strategy to Destroy US Capitalism? Cambodiazation of the Afghan war Rescueing the Pashtuns of Afghania from Afghanistan
    Unite! Erase the Durand Line Solution: Fixing "AfPak" expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan & Afghanistan The emerging "Leave Pakistan to Afghanistan" strategy goes mainstream--Extricating the US from the Lost in the Khyber

  •  
     
    defensebriefs

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March 11th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

    • Kristensen likened the clash to the "cat-and-mouse" games that used to take place between Soviet and American ships trying to gather intelligence on each other's navies. He said the parallels were troubling,
    • "We demand that the United States put an immediate stop to related activities and take effective measures to prevent similar acts from happening," Ma said at a regularly scheduled news briefing.
    • He called the incident Sunday the most serious brush with China since 2001. One of the Chinese vessels came within 25 feet of the Impeccable
    • Beijing has long been suspicious of U.S. surveillance activities around China, even as many in Washington remain wary of Beijing's rapid military buildup.

    It used to be called "gun boat diplomacy. The US Navy has again threatened Chinese sovereignty by challenging the People Liberation Army's Navy (PLAN) in the Sea of China. At the heart of contention is the American refusal to accept the Chinese territorial zone of the Chinese mainland. According to the law of sea and the UN,  most countries of the world accept the zone of sovereignty as 50 miles and the economic zone is 200 miles. The US only accept the territory of 12 miles off the shore as Chinese territory.

    It is obvious that the Obama Administration is provoking China, just like the Bush Obama began its term by provoking China with overflights of spy plains. The last time, the Chinese forced the plane down, dismantled it and then bargained hard to return it. It was returned after being duplicated part by part. This time there are few bruised egos, but no harm has been done.

    Reporting from Shanghai -- China blamed the United States on Tuesday for a naval confrontation in the South China Sea over the weekend, contending that an American surveillance vessel was illegally conducting activities in China's special economic zone.


    The U.S. Defense Department had complained that five Chinese ships surrounded and harassed the Impeccable, a submarine-surveillance ship, in international waters on Sunday. The Chinese boats dropped wood debris in the Impeccable's path, and one of the ships came within 25 feet of the unarmed U.S. vessel, the Pentagon said, calling the actions dangerous, unprofessional and in violation of international law.

    The incident, the latest of several recent confrontations between Chinese boats and aircraft and American surveillance vessels, heightened geopolitical tensions and triggered a jump in oil prices Monday.

    U.S. officials said a formal protest had been lodged with the Chinese Foreign Ministry as well as the Chinese Embassy in Washington. It was unclear whether Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton would bring up the matter with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi during a meeting today in Washington.
    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu on Tuesday said, "The U.S. claims are gravely in contravention of the facts and confuse black and white, and they are totally unacceptable to China."

    "We demand that the United States put an immediate stop to related activities and take effective measures to prevent similar acts from happening," Ma said at a regularly scheduled news briefing.

    Ma did not describe what happened, nor did he say in what way the U.S. ship had violated international and Chinese laws. But China regards most of the area of the South China Sea as its territory.

    The confrontation took place about 75 miles south of China's Hainan island, near a naval base where Beijing has started operating new nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines, said Hans M. Kristensen, nuclear information project director at the Federation of American Scientists.
    Writing in the federation's Web blog, Kristensen said the incident was "part of a wider and dangerous cat and mouse game between U.S. and Chinese submarines and their hunters."

    The Pentagon reported that Chinese vessels had engaged in other aggressive behavior in the last week, including aircraft performing flybys and a patrol vessel shining a high-intensity spotlight on a U.S. naval ship in the Yellow Sea.

    The latest incident "will make life harder for those in the Obama administration who want to ease the military pressure on U.S.-Chinese relations, and easier for hard-liners to argue their case," Kristensen said. China says U.S. provoked naval confrontation. By Don Lee March 11, 2009. don.lee@latimes.com. Times staff writer Greg Miller in Washington contributed to this report.

    One wonders, what American ships are doing near the Chinese secret Submarine base of Hainan? Obviously this is a crude attempt to brow beat the PLAN and spy on China's coastline. The charges of "harassment" as as true as the incident manufactured in the "Gulf Of Tonkin".

     

    This U.S. Navy photo shows a Chinese crewmember using a grapple hook in an apparent attempt to snag part of the USNS Impeccable on Sunday as it conducted routine surveillance.
    This U.S. Navy photo shows a Chinese crewmember using a grapple hook in an apparent attempt to snag part of the USNS Impeccable on Sunday as it conducted routine surveillance.

    BEIJING — Was it a test of President Obama? A military game of "cat and mouse"? Or a potentially hazardous confrontation with echoes of the Cold War?

    As China and the U.S. traded new accusations Tuesday over this week's incident in which Chinese vessels harassed a U.S. Navy ship, nearly causing a collision at sea, experts on China tried to decipher just how serious the episode was.

    "It seems that when a new (U.S.) administration comes in, suddenly these incidents pop up," said Hans Kristensen, a specialist on nuclear arms and Chinese military affairs at the Federation of American Scientists.

    MORE: Clinton, Chinese minister meet amid sea tensions

    He and other experts drew parallels with the 2001 collision of a Chinese plane with a U.S. surveillance jet, which posed George W. Bush's first major foreign policy crisis as president. This time around, Kristensen said, China's decision to send five ships to intercept the USNS Impeccable, an unarmed surveillance ship, may have been a demonstration of military might intended to assert China's dominance of the South China Sea — and gauge how the Obama administration would react.

    U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair said Tuesday that China recently has become "more militarily aggressive." He called the incident Sunday the most serious brush with China since 2001. One of the Chinese vessels came within 25 feet of the Impeccable, then other ships veered into its path when it tried to withdraw. Contributing: Associated Press. Bad parallels seen in Chinese naval clash  By Calum MacLeod, USA TODAY

    The aggressive behavior of China can be judged during the visit of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Beijing in which she begged the Chinese to continue to buy the US T-Bonds. The "Middle Kingdom" handed a list of "to dos" to Ms. Clinton which included the request to stop destabilizing South Asia and bring peace to Afghanistan.

    "I think the debate is still on in China whether, as their military power increases, they will be used for good or for pushing people around," Blair told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

    Ma Zhaoxu, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, said the American ship was breaking international and Chinese laws by sailing so close to China's coast. He denied China had done anything wrong and said the Pentagon's claims of harassment were "totally unacceptable to China."

    The Pentagon said the incident took place outside China's sovereign waters, which the United Nations defines as 12 nautical miles beyond a country's coast. However, Ma reiterated China's claim that the U.S. needs permission to patrol within its so-called exclusive economic zone, which extends 200 nautical miles out from its coast into the area where Sunday's incident took place.

    The incident comes at a time when many Chinese want their government to assert its military strength more forcefully. Tong Zeng, a Beijing activist who has pressured the government to assert its sovereignty over disputed islands in the East China Sea, described China's conduct in the Impeccable incident as "normal."

    Tong said that, because of better technology, U.S. ships are able to conduct surveillance from far greater distances than before. The Impeccable was equipped with anti-submarine technology, and the incident took place about 75 miles south of Hainan Island, where China has been expanding a submarine base.

    "In the past, China's policy on the sovereignty issue was too soft," agreed Yan Xuetong, a professor of international relations at Beijing's Tsinghua University. "Our foreign policy must protect our national interest, not just economic interests," Yan said.

    Kristensen likened the clash to the "cat-and-mouse" games that used to take place between Soviet and American ships trying to gather intelligence on each other's navies. He said the parallels were troubling, though, because of several "very nasty incidents" during the Cold War that almost sparked a broader conflict.

    The Americans and Soviets eventually agreed to rules on maritime confrontations to try and keep them from escalating out of control, Kristensen said. "China and America could use that agreement (as a basis) to establish the rules of the road in international waters," he said.

    Lester Ross, a Beijing-based American lawyer at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, said he doubted the Chinese claim of extended maritime sovereignty was legal — but he also urged China and the U.S. to broker a new maritime deal to avoid similar clashes in the future.

    China's economic ties with the U.S. have stayed strong even at times of relative military tension, such as the accidental NATO bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade in 1999.

    China is the biggest sovereign holder of U.S. government debt, and the naval incident may be quickly pushed aside at a time when the global economy is in crisis, Yan said. Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi is still scheduled to meet in Washington today with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    "The (Chinese) government wants to minimize, not escalate, conflicts with the U.S.," Yan said. He predicted the event would be a "very small bump in relations." Contributing: Associated Press. Bad parallels seen in Chinese naval clash  By Calum MacLeod, USA TODAY

    The US has to come to terms with the new realities of the world. This week's Atlantic Monthly wrote an article about the end of the supremacy of the US .It is pedagogical to see the message of Paragh Khanna repeated in the mainstream media.

    In Washington, China's actions were seen as part of a broader pattern of more provocative behavior by Beijing in recent years, including expanded territorial claims and stepped-up military activities.

    "They seem to be more militarily aggressive, forward pushing, than we saw previously," Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair said Tuesday in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. "I think the debate is still on in China as to whether, as their military power increases, it will be used for good or for pushing people around."

    Beijing has long been suspicious of U.S. surveillance activities around China, even as many in Washington remain wary of Beijing's rapid military buildup. But relations between China and the new Obama administration started out on positive terms as Clinton was warmly received during her visit last month to Beijing. The two sides already had agreed to resume a high-level military dialogue that had been broken off last year by the Chinese in protest of a $6.5-billion U.S. arms sale to Taiwan.

    Shi Yinhong, professor of international politics at Beijing's Renmin University, said it was clear that both sides viewed Sunday's encounter as quite serious. The order for the Chinese ships to act, he said, probably came from a very high level.


    Still, Shi said he did not see the incident as having a serious effect on bilateral ties. The Obama administration wants Chinese cooperation on economic issues, he said, and Chinese leaders want to build good relations with the U.S. to advance their international political objectives.
    "

    Both Washington and Beijing will treat it as an individual event," he said. "Both sides will want to deal with it." The U.S. had lodged a complaint against China, saying five of its ships harassed a U.S. surveillance vessel in the South China Sea. China says the American ship was conducting illegal activities.  China says U.S. provoked naval confrontation. By Don Lee March 11, 2009. don.lee@latimes.com. Times staff writer Greg Miller in Washington contributed to this report.

    Pakistanis have always wondered by their dearest friends are being targeted in Pakistan. No one can understand why a Chinese citizen would be targeted in Pakistan. All know that the enemies of Pakistan are harming the brave people of China. Hulbudding Hikmatyar who is in charge of one of the militants groups fighting occupation blames the US forces for harming the Chinese. He claims that his team has never harmed China and does not intend to do so. This leave the American CIA, the Israeli Mossad and the Indian RAW who could be harming Pakistan's interests.

     
     
    defensebriefs

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | March2nd, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

    Americans are good people, as neighbors, as employers and as friends. However as a nation we are gullible, unaware of world affairs and how others manipulate our good intentions. We want to believe in justice and fairplay, but are ignorant of the injustices perpetuated in the name of national interests. Whatever happened to humanity, kindness, and love for fellow man? Whatever happened to the global village? Today the press has given up its role as the 4th pillar of the state. Gone are the days when the major papers in America challenge the painting and shatter the paradigms. Dennis Kucinich made the statement that today's American media is worse than Izvestia and Pravada which used to present only on side of the picture in the totalitarian USSR.  Ron Jacobs has written a prodigiously effulgent piece criticizing the hypocrisy, shallowness ruthlessness and inhumanity of the Rand Papers.

    All other arguments fall on deaf ears.

    The documents are simply repackaged demagoguery justifying the Banality of Occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan: The Rand Papers attempt to complete the circle of complicity between a sycophantic press, and a non-inquisitive servile public which has been forced to accept the the only argument that is being repeatedly propagated by a cabal of right wing ideologues. Unable to see the other options the nation is forced to accept the ruthless occupation as necessary and the only way forward.

    The Thinktanks attempt to complete the circle of complicity between a sycophantic press, and a non-inquisitive servile public. The nation is forced to accept the only argument that it is being repeatedly inundated with

    • It is a document that hides the nature of the US operations in those countries behind an emasculated technospeak, rendering the true nature of the killing and destruction done in the name of the people of the US and the west
    • ..., the task is to kill those who don't want you there and convince the others that they are either better off with the occupier
    • deciding factor in favor of the US occupying forces is their ability to kill with overwhelming force. Naturally, the indigenous population is aware of this--a fact which causes many to go along with the occupier merely as a means to survive
    • report is essentially an analyst's blueprint for perfecting the occupation of a country with the idea that the eventual result will be domination of the locals' minds, culture and economy, with the domination of the geography of secondary consideration or of no consideration at all.
    • the RAND study ignores the human and creative face of resistance by reducing ever element to a quantitative possibility with only so many possible outcomes.
    • The numbers it quotes and the classifications it makes hide the true intent and outcome of the imperial military's actions much like the statistical sheets maintained by men like Adolf Eichmann hid the true nature of the crimes against humanity perpetrated in the removal of Jewish Germans from the fatherland
    • It is repeated in the newspeak of government officials and the sycophantic media that reports their words without challenging their consequences
    • The circle of complicity is completed when the public accepts the arguments made by those officials and media as being the only argument that exists.

    Today the Anti-War movement is as sickly as an AIDS patient in the last throes of his death sentence. It is numb with inactivity and marginalized by the six media empires that simply overwhelm the senses with Orwellian doublespeak. The left has chosen the wrong war over the bad war. In justifying its existence and in order to avoid being labeled as weak, the Democrats have simply tried to rationalize the Afghan war as "the good war"-- even though deep inside every Democrat knows that there were and still are  several options available in Kabul. There are other ways of nabbing the evil does ohter than using daisycutters on the population in the Hindukush.

    The media cannot and will not speak. The silence is deafening!

    Recently, the online site known as Wikileaks (which frequently publishes documents from government and corporate think tanks not meant to be seen by the general public) released a Rand Corporation report on Iraq and Afghanistan counterinsurgency operations titled Intelligence Operations and Metrics in Iraq and Afghanistan. Although unclassified, the document is marked "For Official Use Only" and was distributed to various high officials in the United States and other "Coalition" governments. In one respect, it can be argued that this paper, along with a series of three or four other Rand reports, could be considered in the same vein as the Pentagon Papers on their release in 1971. A more accurate appraisal, however, would characterize this 318 page report as a summation of what the US military and intelligence agencies could have done more effectively.

    This report is essentially an analyst's blueprint for perfecting the occupation of a country with the idea that the eventual result will be domination of the locals' minds, culture and economy, with the domination of the geography of secondary consideration or of no consideration at all. Like the television show Numbers that features a mathematician who works with the FBI by providing mathematical thinking to human endeavors like serial killing, drug smuggling, etc., the RAND study ignores the human and creative face of resistance by reducing ever element to a quantitative possibility with only so many possible outcomes. The numbers it quotes and the classifications it makes hide the true intent and outcome of the imperial military's actions much like the statistical sheets maintained by men like Adolf Eichmann hid the true nature of the crimes against humanity perpetrated in the removal of Jewish Germans from the fatherland. The report draws from counterinsurgency experiences in Vietnam,Northern Ireland, Malaya, and of course, Iraq and Afghanistan.The Rand Papers on Iraq and Afghanistan The Banality of Occupation, By RON JACOBS. Ron Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather Underground, which is just republished by Verso. Jacobs' essay on Big Bill Broonzy is featured in CounterPunch's collection on music, art and sex, Serpents in the Garden. His first novel, Short Order Frame Up, is published by Mainstay Press. He can be reached at:rjacobs3625@charter.net

    The Rand Papers are 300 paged propaganda gimmick disseminated to justify war, destruction, mayhem and aggression. The defeat of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan has come at great cost to the citizens of those countries. Baghdad is resilient and recovered from the devastation of invasion of Mongols under Halaku Khan who obliterated the capital city. This invasion has been worse, because it uses modern means of exterminating enemies. In Iraq more than one million have been killed and 3.5 million left the country and life as refugees in Syria and elsewhere. In Afghanistan the carpet bombing sent the country to the Neanderthal days of Chengiz Khan and the other Mongols who had tried to occupy it earlier.

    The Rand report and other "reviews" simply regurgitate the ideas which have gotten us into so much trouble.

    The contradiction rampant throughout the report can be best phrased in the words of US Army Major Justin Featherstone who told the report's writers after his extensive work with the urban population in southeastern Iraq: “Humanity is what it’s about, a genuine desire to do good by the good people, which can sit side-by-side with killing the people [whom you’re there to kill].” In other words, the task is to kill those who don't want you there and convince the others that they are either better off with the occupier or at least not as bad off as they would be without them. Despite the constant warnings throughout the report's recommendations to avoid killing noncombatants (without every providing a single definition of who composes this element), the report ultimately returns to this statement:

    War, however, is the realm of destruction. Here will be instances in which these men and women will have to put innocents and their property at risk. In such cases, there may be no good outcome, no alternative that promises to benefit all desired ends, but rather one only less undesirable than its alternatives. A pilot might select the alternative of engaging only a few rooms instead of destroying an entire building, with the appropriate airframe and munitions being called on for the task. In lieu of devastating a town, a ground-force commander could find that a limited number of enemy concentrations provide the opportunity to wreak destruction over only a few blocks.

    In other words, the occupier's job remains one that depends on its overwhelming force. Even if the suggestions and lessons learned that are described in this report were to be put into place, the deciding factor in favor of the US occupying forces is their ability to kill with overwhelming force. Naturally, the indigenous population is aware of this--a fact which causes many to go along with the occupier merely as a means to survive. This is not a report about operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and their often bloody results so much as it is a review of the perceived success or failure of those operations. The primary intent of the report is to repeat already familiar lessons about how to construct and maintain an occupation of a country that minimizes the occupiers casualties, maintains domination via fear, cajolery, and manipulation of the personal and tribal relationships of the occupied while simultaneously convincing at least a sizable minority of the population of the occupying nation that their military (in league with the occupier) is working in their interest.

    Written in what can best be described as something akin to a technical writing assignment, the report echoes the recent statements from US generals in the Iraq/Afghan theaters and is reflected in the recent decision by Barack Obama to reduce the numbers of US troops in Iraq to 50,000 over the next 16 months and escalate the battle to subdue Afghanistan. If there is one thing that this document makes clear, it is that the Pentagon and its civilian enablers have no intention of leaving Iraq or Afghanistan on their own. Furthermore, it is their intention to take the lessons they believe they have learned in those two countries and apply them to Pakistan and wherever else their manifest destiny compels them to subdue.

    This is not the Pentagon Papers of the Iraq and Afghanistan occupations/wars. It is a document that hides the nature of the US operations in those countries behind an emasculated technospeak, rendering the true nature of the killing and destruction done in the name of the people of the US and the west. The contemporary version of the policy discussions that were revealed in the Pentagon Papers about the US operation in Vietnam are not here. Nor are the cables and directives that sent men off to kill and die. Those documents have yet to be uncovered. The usefulness of this report is in its look into the mindset of a modern imperial machine: a machine that never questions its mission or the human misery it causes but keeps its mind trained only on how to carry out that mission as efficiently as possible. The banality of the evil of modern warfare is contained in every neutered sentence of this document and the thousands of others like them. It is repeated in the newspeak of government officials and the sycophantic media that reports their words without challenging their consequences. The circle of complicity is completed when the public accepts the arguments made by those officials and media as being the only argument that exists. The Rand Papers on Iraq and Afghanistan The Banality of Occupation, By RON JACOBS. Ron Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather Underground, which is just republished by Verso. Jacobs' essay on Big Bill Broonzy is featured in CounterPunch's collection on music, art and sex, Serpents in the Garden. His first novel, Short Order Frame Up, is published by Mainstay Press. He can be reached at:rjacobs3625@charter.net

    The Orwellian empire of the media is slick in deflecting the issues. There aren't enough hours in the day to shed light on the mendacity of the Murdock Empire that colludes with the other six to propagate lies, half-truths and doublespeak. Instead of covering the colossal human suffering of the Iraqi people with visual images, the media discusses the schisms between the Shia and the Sunni as if that is the problem.

    The Rupert Murdock organization thinks it has won the battle and the war. Actually its meager success has destroyed our prestige around he world and bankrupted our society. We are not talking about the financial meltdown. We can will will eventually recover from the depression--it the moral bankruptcy that has to be fought in the nooks and crannies where intellectual capital hides.

     
     
    defensebriefs
    24 February 2009 @ 09:40 pm

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی |  اخبار روپیہ |  February 24th, 2009 |

    Afghanistan: Hope is not a strategy: Continuation is not a policy.

    Washington is again buzzing with the possibilities. The Pentagon has just completed a study on how to deal with Kabul. The State Department has done its own study. The NEI has given the President another review. Of course the Right wing and Left Wing Think tanks are competing for space with their own agendas and policy preferences. Each new report proposes its own nuances based on the funding it receives and the demeanor and philosophy of its writers. There is a cacophony of voices from the Potomac on how to reduce the blood flowing into the Kabul River. There are the "Surgers" who are in the minority but went along with Obama's mini-surge, and then there are the "Exiters" who recognize the reality of the Afghan situation and want to do what is good for America.

    Mr. Bruce Reidel, one of President Obama's main advisors is a "Surger' who wants to teach the Taliaban a lesson and show that that they will stay in Afghanistan for a long time. Dr. Henry Kissnger is a "Surger" who wants to surround China through bases in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Pakistan and Afghanistan are also giving feedback on the review of Afghan policy that will be completed in March. Pakistan''s ten economists are proposing a Marshall Plan for the region. One of the economists has suggested $60 Billion for Pakistan. The review on Afghanistan is a decision on whether Afghanstan becomes Obama's Vietnam or Reagan's East Germany. Based on the volume of paper from Washington, it seems the "Exiters" seem to be winning. Even Newsweek magazine, a very sober and somewhat balanced magazine seems to have joined the "Exiters".

    Mr. Ralph Peters once a "Surger" is now an "Exiter". Mr. Peter's four possibilities can be listed as choice between an exit strategy or a hasty retreat after the defeat. We see it as follows:

    1) Plan an exist strategy and leave with dignity now or

    2) Wait for the Taliban to run over Karzai's forbidden city

    The ranks of the "Exiters" is surging because of several interlinked factors---the economy and China. Both are inter-related and the dependencies weigh heavy on the White House. Why the US gave up India as a Strategic partner? Without China's help, the USA cannot sustain the bailouts or hope for a recovery. China is willing to give the US a reprieve, but may have a couple of strings attached. China will exact a price. It seems that Beijing at this point will require a pullout from Afghanistan and the resolution of Kashmir. We have always considered Kashmir as the silent "K" in Holbrooke's mission. India’s worst nightmares come true: Long term strategic malaise in a changing world . The People's Daily leaves no doubt that the resolution of Kashmir is not simply a "nice to have" on the "wish list" of Mr. Holbrooke--it a mandated requirement-China's pound of flesh for agreeing to buy American T-Bonds. India feels the pain: The US begs Beijing for money

    It is clear that without Pakistan's cooperation, the US cannot win the war on terror. Therefore, to safeguard its own interests in the fight against terrorism in South Asia, the US must ensure a stable domestic and international environment for Pakistan and ease the tension between Pakistan and India. This makes it easy to understand why Obama appointed Richard Holbrooke as special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan issues, and why India is included in Holbrooke's first foreign visit. In fact, the "Afghan problem", the "Pakistani problem" and the "Indian-Pakistani problem" are all related. China's Official Newspaper: The People's Daily

    The other factor weighing in favor of the "Exiters" is the economy. Neither the US, nor the Europeans are in any position to waste another three Trillion Dollars on unsustainable and unwinnable wars.  And then there is the minor matter of finding a supply chain route to Kabul. the one through Karachi gets choked once too often. The one through Iran is a minefield of Iranian demands and Israeli suspicions. The route through Russia in untenable and too arduous with too many strings. The price of transferring “non-military” hardware through Russia is to give up Ukraine and Georgia back to Russia is too big a price to pay. Moscow’s pound of flesh for allowing base & supplies to Afghanistan

    US base at Minas is being “sold” to the Russians cutting off a possible route to Kabul. Russia asserts itself in Central Asia. The politically deaf President Bush wasted a unique opportunity to wrest the Central Asian Republics away from Moscow. If he had worked with Islamabad on a plan to Americansize the region, it would have worked. However he was too busy bombing Kabul to listed to any sane advice.

    The $80 Billion Thinktank industry fails to get the nuances of Afghanistan and Pakistan.  They try to use the Middle Eastern paradigm or the Indian thinking. Both fail to understand the region between the Indus to the Amu Darya.

    Betrayals & Blackmail in Bakiyev: Cloaking failure as success, hiding the defeat, declaring victory & withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months . Mr. Peters calls it a strategy. It is an plan to exit Afghanistan. Mr. Peter's has read the writing on the wall.

    Instead of floundering in search of a strategy, we should consider removing the bulk, if not all, of our forces. The alternative is to hope blindly, waste more lives and resources, and, in the worst case, see our vulnerable supply route through Pakistan cut, forcing upon our troops the most ignominious retreat since Korea in 1950 (a massive air evacuation this time around, leaving a wealth of military gear).

    Ranked from best to worst, here are our four basic options going forward:

    • Best. Instead of increasing the U.S. military "footprint," reduce our forces and those of NATO by two-thirds, maintaining a "mother ship" at Bagram Air Base and a few satellite bases from which special operations troops, aircraft and drones, and lean conventional forces would strike terrorists and support Afghan factions with whom we share common enemies. All resupply for our military could be done by air, if necessary.
    • Stop pretending Afghanistan's a real state. Freeze development efforts. Ignore the opium. Kill the fanatics.
    • Good. Leave entirely. Strike terrorist targets from over the horizon and launch punitive raids when necessary. Instead of facing another Vietnam ourselves, let Afghanistan become a Vietnam for Iran and Pakistan. Rebuild our military at home, renewing our strategic capabilities.
    • Poor. Continue to muddle through as is, accepting that achieving any meaningful change in Afghanistan is a generational commitment. Surge troops for specific missions, but not permanently.
    • Worst. Augment our forces endlessly and increase aid in the absence of a strategy. Lie to ourselves that good things might just happen. Let U.S. troops and Afghans continue to die for empty rhetoric, while Pakistan decays into a vast terrorist refuge.

    Afghanistan: The writing is on the wall. Can Obama read it? Time is not on the side of the USA. The war in Afghanistan is unsustainable and the Taliban can carry on forever, harassing the supply chain, continuing the hit and run operations against the US forces, keeping the Europeans at bay, and keeping the pressure on Kabul with hard hitting and morale destroying attacks every few weeks.

    UK Brig. Smith: “We’re not going to win this [Afghan] war”

    Obviously the trends in Afghanistan have been in the wrong direction, and I think everyone is rightly concerned about them…Certainly in Afghanistan, wresting control of certain areas from the Taliban will be very difficult… In both [Afghanistan and Pakistan], in certain areas, the going may be tougher before it gets easier.”   CENTCOM commander Gen. David H. Petraeus quoted from a recent New York Times interview,

    The foreign forces are ensuring the survival of a regime which would collapse without them . . . They are slowing down and complicating an eventual exit from the crisis, which will probably be dramatic… In the short term we should dissuade the American presidential candidates from getting more bogged down in Afghanistan . . . The American strategy is doomed to fail.” Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, fromer British ambassador to Afghanistan, and now the UKs special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanist: Hereportedly wile speaking to the deputy French ambassador to Kabul François Fitou

    The conflict in Afghanistan is the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time. Instead of concentrating on the critical mission of keeping Islamist terrorists on the defensive, we've mired ourselves by attempting to modernize a society that doesn't want to be — and cannot be — transformed.

    In the absence of a strategy, we're doubling our troop commitment, hoping to repeat the success we achieved in the profoundly different environment of Iraq. Unable to describe our ultimate goals with any clarity, we're substituting means for ends.

    Expending blood and treasure blindly in Afghanistan, we do our best to shut our eyes to the worsening crisis next door in Pakistan, a radicalizing Muslim state with more than five times the population and a nuclear arsenal. We've turned the hose on the doghouse while letting the mansion burn.Ralph Peters is a retired Army officer, a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors and the author of Looking For Trouble: Adventures in a Broken World. Posted at 12:16 AM/ET, February 24, 2009 in Foreign Affairs - Middle East - Forum,Peters | The mendacity of hope The U.S. essentially has four options — from best to worst — going forward in Afghanistan. By Ralph Peters

    if President Reagan will be remembered for the breakup of the USSR, and the reunification of Germany, President Bush will be remembered for losing wars in Iraq-Afghanistan and losing the Central Asian republics to Russia. Mr. Ralph Peters is wrong when he says that "Afghanistan wasn't a war of choice". President Bush had a choice of stationing 5000 marines in Tarbela and smoking out the evil guys. He chose to carpet bomb all of Afghanistan with Daisy Cutters and not work to moderate the rulers of Kabul. He had an opportunity to use a moderate Afghanistan to placate and win over the Central Asian Republics. By listening to the likes of Mr. Peters, Bush lost the battle and America lost the war, and the world lost Central Asia to Moscow. The implications of the IMU activity in Pakistan

    Initially, Afghanistan wasn't a war of choice. We had to dislodge and decimate al-Qaeda, while punishing the Taliban and strengthening friendlier forces in the country. Our great mistake was to stay on in an attempt to build a modernized rule-of-law state in a feudal realm with no common identity.

    We needed to smash our enemies and leave. Had it proved necessary, we could have returned later for another punitive mission. Instead, we fell into the great American fallacy of believing ourselves responsible for helping those who've harmed us. This practice was already fodder for mockery 50 years ago, when the novella and film "The Mouse That Roared" postulated that the best way for a poor country to get rich was to declare war on America then surrender.

    Even if we achieved the impossible dream of creating a functioning, unified state in Afghanistan, it would have little effect on the layered crises in the Muslim world. Backward and isolated, Afghanistan is sui generis (only example of its kind). Political polarization in the U.S. precludes an honest assessment, but Iraq's the prize from which positive change might flow, while Afghanistan could never inspire neighbors who despise its backwardness.

    Imran Khan, Pakistan's eloquent and independently patriotic Paskhtun politician said it best "the Americans will leave, and we will have to deal with the mess that they created" in Afghanistan. This is the same sort of mess that the Russians left behind. At the time Afghanistan deteriorated into a decade long civil war. US, Pakistani, Saudi and UEA policy makers came up with the Taliban to bring peace to the war ridden region. It worked. Unfortunately the insane elements within the Taliban and the evil people within Al-Qaeda tangled with the USA and brought US intervention. If 9/11 had not happened, the Taliban could have been convinced and coerced into moderation. At the time they were in control of the Pakistanis and could have been molded in a different direction. However President Bush's Gung Ho Cowboy testosterone "Charge of the Light Brigade" wanted to destroy them with "shock and awe", humiliate them with Abu Ghraib, and decapitate them with Gitmo. Looking back--it was a failed policy based on fear and reprisals against the wrong people. Imran Khan appearing on GPS with Fareed Zakaria reminded the American people that "The Taliban was not the enemy--the enemy was Al-Qaeda". American Cut and Paste Armchair analysts, and British  Lazy-Boy Thinktankers were unable or unwilling to differentiate between the various players. the inability to distinguish the differences among the competing forces was a fatal mistake. Perhaps those with a vested interest were happy to see armed conflict.

    Recalling failures of Vietnam

    Echoing Vietnam, we're pouring wealth into Afghanistan, corrupting those we wish to rally; we're fighting with restrictions against an enemy who enjoys sanctuaries across international borders; and our core enemies are natives, not foreign parties (as al-Qaeda was in Iraq).

    If the impending surge fails to pacify the country, will we send another increment of troops, then another, as we did in Southeast Asia? As the British learned the hard way, Afghanistan can be disciplined, but it can't be profitably occupied or liberalized. It's inconceivable to us, but many Afghans prefer their lives to the lives we envision for them. The lot of women is hideous, and the lives of nearly all the people are nasty, brutish and short. But the culture is theirs.

    Even "our man in Kabul," President Hamid Karzai, put his self-interest above any greater cause. Reborn a populist, he backs every Taliban claim that the U.S. inflicts only civilian casualties in virtually every effort against terrorists. Karzai is convinced that we can't abandon him.

    We should do just that.

    Failure and Defeat in Afghanistan: Inevitable Frustration & misdirected Payback for ally Pakistan . Oblivious to American interests, the  pugnacious Anti-Pakistan Islamphobes will continue their pernicious attacks on Pakistanis and the Pakistani state. Many are on the payroll of India Inc and many are Neocons, rejected and debunked by the American electorate. But the Neocons are still around and will be around. They changed colors before, now they will shed their current skin and put on a new one.

    Raplh Peters made famous by his cartography not his intellect is at it again--spouting venom against the most vulnerable population in the world. As ingrates go, is tops the list. He is incapable of finding any reality. The inability to find anything good East of the Hindu Kush is part of his structure and psyche. For Mr. Peters, everything is good West of the Khyber and East of the Indus. Mr. Peters has not read the latest assessment of the situation. India’s worst nightmares come true: Long term strategic malaise in a changing world

    A reality check

    In any event, Pakistan, not Afghanistan, will determine the future of Islamist extremism in the region. And Pakistan is nearly lost to us — a fact we must accept. Our strategic future lies with India.

    President Obama pitched Afghanistan as the good war during his campaign, while rejecting our efforts in Iraq as a sideshow. He got it exactly wrong. Now our new president either needs to lay out a coherent, detailed strategy with realistic goals, or accept that, by mid-2002, we had achieved all that conventional forces could manage in Afghanistan.

    We don't need hope. We need the audacity of realism.Ralph Peters is a retired Army officer, a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors and the author of Looking For Trouble: Adventures in a Broken World. Posted at 12:16 AM/ET, February 24, 2009 in Foreign Affairs - Middle East - Forum,Peters | The mendacity of hope The U.S. essentially has four options — from best to worst — going forward in Afghanistan. By Ralph Peters

    image(Marines on patrol: What’s needed in Afghanistan is not more U.S. troops or hope./Rafiq Maqbool, AP)

    Solution: Fixing “AfPak” expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan & Afghanistan. Bruce Reidel, General Patraeus, Barack Obama, David Brown, David Milliband etc. all see Pakistan and Afghanistan as one entity–”PakAf”. Even sober journals like Newsweek quoting stalwarts have begun to seriously recognize the reality of the union and have been writing about the proposal to formally merge Pakistan and Afghanistan into one entity. Pakistan's "Do More" list to the USA . Since 2001 we have been proposing a Marshal Plan for Pakistan and Afghanistan. This is the only solution, now being recognized by the Obama Administration. Trade First not Aid First

    So why not just get out? As always, it’s not so simple. If the Americans pull their troops out, the already shaky Afghan Army could collapse. (Once they lost U.S. air support, South Vietnamese troops sometimes refused to take the field and fight.) Afghanistan could well plunge into civil war, just as it did after the Soviets left in 1989. Already, the Pashtuns in the south regard the American-backed Tajiks who dominate Karzai’s administration as the enemy. The winning side would likely be the one backed by Pakistan, which may end up being the Taliban—just as it was in the last civil war.

    Some argue this wouldn’t be such a bad outcome, if the Taliban could be bribed or persuaded to not let Al Qaeda set up terrorist training bases on Afghan territory. According to one senior Taliban leader, a former deputy minister in Mullah Mohammed Omar’s government who would only speak anonymously, some Pakistani officials are urging the insurgents to do something like this now—in return for talks with the Americans. On the other hand, Islamabad could be playing with fire. Given the longstanding ties between the Pakistani and Afghan Taliban, a jihadist state on its border is a threat to Pakistan, too. And here, U.S. national-security interests definitely do come into play. Newsweek. With Ron Moreau and Sami Yousafzai

    Solutions to AfPak Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months Obama to unveil new policy: Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan
    Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view Peek into Obama’s brains: Bruce Reidel on Pakistan Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan
    Obama advisor Weinbaum predicts total Afghan policy review: Sees focus on talks & Reconciliation Afghanistan: Gen. Petraeus’ Pakistani advisers: Indians jittery Obama adviser gives deep insights into new Afghan policy

    Kabul: The Final assault begins. How long can NATO hang on? Does Obama have the courage to implement the real solutions to Obama’s Vietnam (AfPak)

    2009: Obama’s South Asian policy: A Marshall Plan for AfPak

    Selective Amnesia of Americans: Pakistan is the most mistreated friend in the world

    Fixing AfPak expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan and Afghanistan

    The Algeriafication of Pakistan, the Egyptianization of Bangladesh may will yield Iranian type of revolutions

    Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived. ~Abraham Lincoln In 1821 Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam” Kabul: The Final Spring Offensive? End of NATO? Afghanistan: The writing is on the wall. Can Obama read it? UK Brig. Smith: “We’re not going to win this [Afghan] war”
    Failure and Defeat in Afghanistan: Inevitable Frustration & misdirected Payback for ally Pakistan US Charge of the Light Brigade into Pakistan is a US failure and has to stop

    Pakistan’s do more list for the USA Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan & Swat run by Taliban Huge Migraine for India

    Facing the Khyber poltergeist & Ganges hobgoblin NATO war: UK 1880 defeats in Afghanistan
    “Charge of the Light Brigade” in Afghanistan AGAIN: Unfortunately the lessons of the unmitigated disaster of “Auckland’s Folly”, (First Anglo-Afghan War 1838–42) have not been taught to the Oxbridge students.

    Bin Laden used Reagan’s USSR strategy to Destroy US Capitalism? Cambodiazation of the Afghan war Rescueing the Pashtuns of Afghania from Afghanistan

    Unite! Erase the Durand Line Solution: Fixing “AfPak” expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan & Afghanistan